Over the last year, the spread of voter photo ID laws and other new voting restrictions have earned widsepread attention from election watchdogs and the media. But one important issue has largely escaped public scrutiny: the large number of citizens blocked from voting due to a past felony conviction.

In part, the lack of attention to felon disenfranchisement laws has been due to a dearth of fresh data. That changed last week, when the D.C.-based Sentencing Project, a criminal justice reform group, released a new report on the impact of disenfranchisement laws in each state.

As covered before in Facing South, felon disenfranchisement laws have always had a unique history in the South, where they were used as a form of political control over newly-freed African-Americans.

That legacy lives on today: According to Sentencing Project data, more than 4.15 million Southerners are denied voting rights due to felony disenfranchisement. That’s five percent of the total Southern electorate, and more than 70 percent of the 5.85 million voters nationally barred from voting by such laws.

The racial legacy lives on, too: Nearly 12 percent of black voters in Southern states are barred from casting a ballot due to felon disenfranchisement laws. In Florida, Kentucky and Virginia, more than 20 percent of African-Americans are denied the franchise.

Laws denying ex-felons the vote unquestionably have an impact on election results. While many Democrats blame the outcome of the Florida 2000 election on Ralph Nader’s 97,421 votes, a bigger factor was the 827,000 voters — disproportionately African-American and Democratic-leaning — blocked under the state’s disenfranchisement law.

That could be the case again in 2012. In Florida, for example, former GOP governor Charlie Crist famously relaxed the state’s prohibitions on ex-felon voting. But in 2011, Republican Gov. Rick Scott reversed course, ordering a five-year waiting period before voting rights can be restored.

Today, one in 10 eligible Florida citizens are banned from voting under the laws — the highest disenfranchisement rate in the nation, and a huge swath of the electorate in one of the country’s biggest battleground states.

Read a full copy of The Sentencing Project report here [pdf].

Editor's note: This story originally published at If you appreciate these stories, please support their work by making a donation at Feature image: Licensed by at
Chris Kromm

Chris Kromm

I am executive director of the Institute for Southern Studies, a non-profit media, research and policy center based in Durham, North Carolina. I'm also publisher and contributor to the Institute's publications Facing South online and Southern Exposure magazine, winner of the National Magazine Award, two George Polk Awards, and other honors. I have appeared on over 300 TV and radio broadcasts for commentary on Southern politics and current issues, including American Public Media's "Marketplace," CNN "Live," C-SPAN, Democracy Now, GRITtv, KPOJ Portland, Minnesota Public Radio, Mississippi Public Radio, NPR's "All Things Considered," Public Radio International's "To the Point," WAOK Atlanta, WBAI New York, WRAL TV North Carolina, WRNO New Orleans, WUNC North Carolina's "The State of Things" and XM Satellite Radio. I contribute regularly to The Huffington Post, and my reporting and writing have also been published in The Durham Herald-Sun, The Hill, The Independent Weekly, The Nation, The Raleigh News & Observer, Salon and other publications. My work focuses on leading high-impact projects that link media, research, policy and community participation strategies to promote equity, democracy and sustainability.

  1. Voting is the core of democracy. Instead of making it easier to vote, lawmakers are succeeding in making it more difficult. The reasons are obvious. Why is it so easy to pay taxes through the U.S. Mail or online? Why aren’t these legislative ships of fools concerned about fraud in this process? Voting actually has always been a challenge. Tuesdays when most are at work or in school is enough of a barrier. Louisiana use Saturdays which makes sense. Why are our parent-lawmakers so intent on “protecting” us from the perils of imagined fraud? Why do the heathen rage?

    1. Government by the people is not a desidertum to petty potentates who perceive themselves as royals chosen via plebiscite. People chosen to rule are not keen on being relegated to servant status. If universal suffrage can’t be reversed, the herd has to be thinned some other way.

  2. Seems to me the obvious solution is not to break the law in the first place or maybe it’s time to let rapists and murders of our daughters and loved ones lead the charge to the new enlightened land.

    1. Lee Leslie

      That’s easy for violent crimes, but this story is about all those who fill our prisons for non-violent crimes, drugs, stupid things people do while young, etc. It’s about how we bloat the number of people in certain politically connected counties with people who are counted for federal aid and race, but can’t vote. 

  3. I believe anyone the is capable of committing a crime against another whether it be a pedophile, theft , drugs, rape, murder, sex offender, white collar crime or even an elected official convicted of anything more than a misdemeanor should not be allowed to vote! Otherwise, you will have a bunch of criminals passing laws to accommodate their life styles. Maybe that is what is wrong with our country today; we have a bunch of CRIMINALS running and RUINING OUR COUNTRY!
    Law Biding Citizen

  4. Whoever wrote this story is a Knucklehead and should to allowed to vote or produce offspring!

  5. And there is this: prison should serve not only as punishment, but also as rehabilitation. After all, we’re talking here about people who have been released from prison — would you rather they become full-fledged members of society, or continue to be isolated? Having the chance to vote works a wonder for a person — it gives a sense of ownership, of involvement. I am very close to someone who recently regained his right to vote — I could consider that for several years, he couldn’t cancel out my vote, and now, drat the luck, he does! On the other hand, he is now much more interested in civic matters. The more draconian laws are, the more draconian daily life is.

  6. When the full sentence for the crime has been served, all rights should be restored. Parolees should not have rights restored until the full sentence time is complete or pardoned.

Comments are closed.