We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
Number of posts: 193
Email address: email
Subscribe to my RSS Feed: http://likethedew.com/author/monicasmith/feed/
Posts by Monica Smith:
It’s been a puzzlement to democratic, liberty-loving folk. Why do Americans in the heartland keep flocking to politicians who lie and make empty promises they never deliver on? There have been many explanations, some assigning fault to people behaving like sheep and following whoever steps up to lead them; others identifying a punitive religious tradition which persuades the electorate that the lesser evil is all they can expect in the political arena. And then there are the people in the Democratic party who argue that, if a political majority can be won by the numbers along the edges of the continent, dismissing the heartland as not worth contesting is just being practical.
Freedom is Obedience
Having witnessed, from a distance, the robot invasion of Liberty Square, one observer was moved to comment that she’d thought of the NYPD as predators, but never actually said the word out loud. It is hard to admit that one’s own kind are behaving like senseless creatures of the wild. Besides, while stalking the unwary prey and attacking in the dead of night certainly looks like a nightmare that might terrify a child, the destruction of the village was obviously not aimed to sustain the horde. Neither the robots nor the clean-up crew took anything for themselves.
A village was destroyed.
Banksters and Credit
This is what the federal government allocating credit looks like. It is the banksters’ worst nightmare because allocating credit–deciding who gets to use money for how long and at what cost–is how they make a living. They should have thought about that before turning their counting houses into gambling dens.
What the banksters like is to red-line loans to people they don’t like and then wait for the federal government to bribe them with an insurance package to cover any loss if the people they don’t like end up being swamped by high interest rates and fees and default.
If the descendants of the Africans who were imported to the Americas thought that equal treatment would assure better treatment and a higher quality of life, they were disabused of that notion at least twice. First came Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court decision which made segregation legal wherever it seemed attractive throughout the land. Then came Brown v. Board of Education to, effectively, write finis to the idea that equal treatment is even related to quality. As the subsequent decades have clearly shown, there is nothing to prevent 99% of the people from being equally and routinely deprived of their rights.
Normally, it is not recommended that an individual try this by himself. Marine Sergeant Shamar Thomas is obviously not an ordinary man. Fortunately, there are still some NYPD cops who can be shamed. Lovely touch that white shirt using a bull horn to address a war hero!
That’s the title we might expect from the main stream media, who always like themselves some confrontation. The outfit that caught Congressman John Lewis’ interaction with Occupy Atlanta, tagged it as “Occupy Atlanta Silences Civil Rights Hero John Lewis.” Presumably, that still fits into the media theme of the week, influenced by Eric Cantor of Virginia referring to “mobs,” that the citizens occupying various public spaces to work through their grievances with society as they know it are some sort of rag-tag crew.
‘Twas over two years ago that President Obama told the bankers
“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
That was, as any reader of my blog should know, long after I’d started nattering about the Bush administration looking for needles in haystacks that hadn’t been built. My characterization of our “intelligence” operations hasn’t gone anywhere, perhaps because the people working on “intelligence” are as unfamiliar with haystacks as the banksters are with pitchforks. Though, you’d think the meaning of a fork made to throw things out would be pretty clear.
As I’ve written many times, the line between the cop and the crook is really thin. Deprivation of rights under cover of law is where they merge. How very clever of the City of New York to herd citizens onto the Brooklyn Bridge and then arrest them! Human husbandry on parade.
From the Huffington Post, which I don’t usually consult:
Joshua Stephens, 33, had joined the protest march and had ended up on the Brooklyn Bridge. He managed to avoid being one of the 500 or so penned in by the NYPD and arrested. HuffPost reached him by phone, and he provided a first-hand narrative of just what happened on the bridge:
I don’t say that because poverty used to be a virtue (and, as far as I’m concerned, still is) but because the definition of poor depends to a large extent who’s counting what. If people don’t report their income to the tax man, there’s no way for our government to know how much or little they earn, unless somebody who’s holding a lot of unearned income for them files a report. Most of the country is still on the honor system. Which is, of course, why a whole lot of banksters got away with cooking the books.
But, that’s neither here nor there…
They were destroyed by an idea. Let me try to explain.
I spent $240 at a children’s clothing store the other day and it felt good. ‘Cause I’m a job sustainer when I do that. Then I went to the P.O. and spent another $11 to send the stuff across the country to a grand kid that’s having a birthday. The guy behind the counter was glad to see a job sustainer too.
Which makes me think that, again, we’ve allowed the conservatives to write the script…
Our Federal Bureau of Investigations has had a busy week, according to the summary press release for the week of September 16, 2011.
Of course, most of these are not current violent crimes that are being addressed, so probably don’t account for the fact that there’s been a significant drop in that category. Nevertheless, we can hope that putting some of these nuts out of commission, will have a salutary effect.
To highlight a few:
I don’t mean Libya. According to rumor, Obama had to be dragged into that intervention by the women in his administration.
I was beginning to wonder if his mother had deprived him of knowing what abuse looks like when he sees it by protecting him from an abusive father. When authority stands silent in the face of abuse, it becomes complicit – disastrous for a person in his position. Victims of spousal abuse know all that. For centuries, they have been told that more obedience is required if beatings are to cease.
That his conservative colleagues on Capitol Hill are into abuse big time seemed not to have registered with President Obama.
You’d think that adult persons, competent enough to be employed by the Detroit News, would know better than to let their jealousy of the younger generation be on blatant display. You’d be wrong. Richie Rich is getting a free lunch. Oh, no!
Check this out: A new federal program plans to give every student in qualifying schools two free meals and snack. Every student, regardless of income. Even those who don’t normally qualify for free/reduced meals. Proponents of the program say this will help erase the “stigma” of getting free food when other classmates pay for their lunches (or bring their own). Is that a good enough reason to spend billions of dollars feeding kids who aren’t hungry?
Today I’d like to point out two in connection with the Affordable Care Act, which has recently been in the news because some study by the Kaiser Foundation determined that most Americans don’t know what the health insurance reform effort was/is actually all about. And there’s a good reason for that. The health insurance industry, whose profits are certain to shrink, even if their customer base gets bigger, don’t want people to know. And their agents in various state government positions don’t want to tell the truth either.
Thinking that perhaps his message will have more impact, if, instead of submitting to interviews, he communicates his ideas directly, Warren Stephens, the $2.5 billionaire CEO of Little Rock’s Stephens, Inc, has authored an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. Under the title, “Business Regulation vs. Growth: The View from Middle America,” which he probably didn’t choose, Stephens, purporting to speak for firms with revenues between $25 million and one billion a year, identifies the problems these middle Americans have with uncertainty.
It is really difficult to dispute the claims of a person, in this case one Fred Siegel, published in the Wall Street Journal, under the title, “Who Lost the Middle Class?” who can’t tell the difference between cause, consequence and coincidence. But, I’m going to try by responding to just a few assertions, beginning with his first paragraph:
Forty years from now, politicians, writers, and historians may struggle to understand how America, once the quintessential middle-class society, became as socially stratified as Europe or even Brazil.
Rupert Murdoch, the founder and chairman of News Corporation, knows well that privacy is a valuable commodity. That’s why his organization invaded the privacy of victims of crime by hacking into their cell accounts. One man’s privacy is another man’s profit.
It’s also why the American subsidiary of News Corporation, News America Marketing, has spent over two million dollars trying to get a whistleblower, Robert Emmel, to shut up about the underhanded strategies News America used to do a Tonya Harding on its competition.
What is it about politicians named Scott that they seem to get a leg up on the competition when it comes to elections? It’s not that a name beginning with the letter ‘S’ has the same “first-in-the-alphabet; first in line” advantage that’s accorded to the ‘A’s and ‘B’s. Maybe it’s just a matter of familiarity that’s derived from Scott tissues and Scott bikes and archery equipment, that accounts for the relative ease with which a Scott Walker, a Scott Brown or a Rick Scott can jump to the head of the line. Of course, in the latter’s case the electorate went for notoriety, instead of common sense.
Anyway, in the process of putting together what I’m going to call the “Barney Fife Brigade,”* members of the House whose cluelessness pretty much demands that they be replaced, I came across yet another Scott whose antics might just make voters think twice about what’s in a name. This one’s from Georgia, Austin Scott, who came in with the Tea Party crowd in 2010, squeezing out a moderate Democrat because, just maybe, voters confused him with the other Georgian Scott, David, who’s been representing parts of Atlanta since 2003.
And with good reason. The presumptuous Standard and Poor’s downgrade of United States Treasury bonds isn’t working out real well. As a last-ditch effort it looks like a bust. The Asian markets are reporting that the bonds themselves seem minimally affected.
The 10-year Treasury yield increased to 2.579 percent, from 2.563 percent at Friday’s New York close, while the yield on two-year Treasuries fell to 0.268 percent from 0.292 percent, contrary to some predictions of a much more aggressive initial market reaction.
But, to see the real source of the malaise…
We don’t even need to know who they are to know that the designation of yet another special or super group to decide which pound of the public’s flesh to cut is a bad idea. The Catfood Commission was made up of the Gang of Six. This time there are twelve, as yet un-knowns. Twice as bad. Double trouble.
Actually, the long term effect may well be worse. Because, instead of bringing a halt to the tradition of Congress sluffing off its obligations, a tradition that perhaps commenced with the creation of the Federal Reserve, a private bank to manage the currency, the designation of yet another artificial body of surrogates puts the stamp of approval on the shirk.
Only sixteen so far this year from Brunswick on the coast to, most recently, Stockbridge and Atlanta. In Stockbridge it was the High Trust Bank that let people down and in Atlanta it was One Georgia Bank that got acquired by an outfit called Ameris. If it seems like there’s not been a lot of fuss and bother, it may just be that the FDIC is working like it ought.
That’s obviously a dismissive injunction; another way of saying “mind your own business.” However, directed at Congressman Paul Broun, M.D., it might well be a recipe for disaster, since, if his prescription for the economy is consistent with his medical perspective, Broun seems stuck in a medieval frame of mind–relying on blood-letting and, if the patient is already bleeding, the amputation of another limb.
But, don’t take my word for it. Here, with the subject heading, “Broun’s Bill to LOWER the Debt Ceiling,” is Broun’s prescription:
In the midst of our economic emergency, which is beginning to resemble a full-on Greece-style meltdown, every politician in America has taken to the soap box to say the exact same thing: We need to reduce our national debt and cut spending to get America back on track.
New Hampshire is one of the richest states in the nation and has one of the lowest unemployment rates. One reason for those realities is the further reality that the really poor cannot survive in regions where babies freeze to death in their beds in winter. So, if they’ve got any sense, they head South.
Rochester–“It’ll be the first time since 1972 that we will have to institute a waiting list,” said Strafford Nutrition Meals on Wheels Director Emily Sylvain, the day before her new fiscal year kicked in on July 1…
What do bankers and agents of government have in common? For the most part, they are middlemen acting on someone else’s behalf. This is what makes them competitors. At least, according to the banksters. They see the public purse as a pot of money and they want a part of whatever falls out, when the strings are loosed. Dodd-Frank is an effort to limit how much they can claim.
It ain’t pretty, but it is good to know that fees banks can charge on debit cards range from 21% to 23%. That’s Dodd-Frank at work. The banks used to charge over 30% — a transaction tax. Who knew?
Evidence that a person is well on his way to becoming an icon can be found in his name being used, as an aside, to validate otherwise spurious theories by the likes of Stephen Stanley – sitting up in Stamford, Connecticut writing for Market Watch that Keynesian economic policies are (ought to be) about to be replaced.
I don’t question that Warren Stephens, the billionaire banker and Lord of Little Rock, likely agrees with Stanley. He said as much in an interview with the Wall Street Journal – simply referring to Stephens in a caption of an illustration to an opinion piece, is to elevate him to the status of icon as is so often done with Ronald Reagan.
Our commercial class does perceive itself to be in competition with government (private v. public corporations) in the interest of managing and manipulating the population for fun and profit. If we don’t appreciate that, it’s largely because we don’t conceive of the manipulation of people as the primary function of government. Although some irascible and unwieldy people are in need of restraint and deterrence, the liberal expectation for government is that it address the vagaries of nature and the natural impediments to human sustenance and survival. That is, we’re into caring and sharing, rather than control.
Flattery. Why does it work? Because conservatives want to be seduced and they want to believe good things about themselves. Besides, their lack of awareness keeps them from recognizing that the flattery is fake.
To the self-directed, fake flattery may seem abhorrent. In accordance with the golden rule, it’s not something they want to do. Indeed, it seems almost immoral. But, when you consider that conservatives are practically inept — that many, if not all, their endeavors end in failure and failure is, in turn, incapacitating — flattery based on even the most minimal achievement is a…
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
The 31st Chinese Export Commodities Fair (Spring) was held from 15 April to 15 May 1972, and most of the foreign traders attended for the whole month. While the main purpose of the Fair was for China to exhibit and sell its products to the western world, buyers from the Beijing Government’s import agencies attended to negotiate the purchase of raw materials, metals, minerals and other commodities from the west, hopefully paying with Chinese goods. China saw itself as a potential exporter of machinery and equipment, automobiles and other manufactured goods. In reality most of what was on display at the F Read on →
My friend Tom says most, if not all, great writers are fractured individuals. I hope he’s wrong about that; I’ve always been a happy, well-adjusted guy. I plan to achieve Great Writer status one day and would hate to think lack of a tortured soul, along with precious little talent, will prevent such dreams. The only thing even remotely dark about me is my middle name. If I had been a girl, none of this would have happened. I would have been Betty Louise. At least that’s what my mother said. The Mike part of my name originated with an old Army Read on →
This is a book about the 1%, the billionaires, or some of them, who can pay $50 million for a condo they use a couple weeks a year while otherwise camped in one of their other lavish homes. Mitt Romney accused ordinary people of feelings of entitlement when they expect social security and medicare but Mitt was playing to his audience, the true practitioners of entitlement. But this is not a political book. The wall street protests are mentioned in passing but its focus is the acquisition of Fifteen Central Park West property, the construction of the outstanding structure and Read on →
I sympathize with those brushing aside the "Deflategate" scandal swirling around the New England Patriots as much ado over little of consequence. After all, the Patriots absolutely annihilated the Indianapolis Colts 45-7 in the AFC Championship Game on January 18. It’s hard to conceive any edge Patriots quarterback Tom Brady allegedly gained from playing with deliberately underinflated footballs could be primarily responsible for that butt whipping. Still, I’ve long wondered what our easy acceptance of cheating in sports says about our society. Considering the "Spygate" incident of 2007, when New England coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 and his team $250,000 for Read on →