- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
National stock transfer tax would raise billions to offset deficits
Ever since mankind organized himself into governments, there’s been a need to pay for the services that governments provide. How to tax and what to tax has been, and will continue to be, a main topic of conversation.
You may remember prior to when our government was being formed, there was a revolt against the “tea tax” that the British government sought to enforce. Yes, it was “Indians” who started that rebellion in the Boston Harbor.
An early incident in this country centered around imposing the federal excise tax on whiskey.
Here in Georgia, recently the Legislature imposed a “bed tax” on hospitals.
Finding ways to tax is always on the table, and always a risky business for the politicians. Therefore, we often get bad taxing methods. Lots of commerce goes untaxed, often with key lobbyists flexing their muscles. It gets you to thinking about the fairness of it all.
Now comes an idea to tax an industry that is not taxed, a system which could raise a lot of money, and yet it would be a tax many people would never feel. That idea is to tax stock market transactions with a small federal levy that could go a long way to getting our country out of its deficit.
Anticipated being proposed by Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa and Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon, both Democrats, is to levy a tax of three basis points (0.03 or three hundredth of a percentage point) on most stock market transactions. That’s three cents on each $100 traded. It would apply to all stock market trades, except not on initial public offerings, nor on bonds, nor initial investments and withdrawals from tax-protected accounts, such as 401k savings. The revenue would be collected at the time of sale by the stock market.
How much would it raise? A whopping $35.2 BILLION a year!
The idea is being floated here, but is also being considered in Europe, where 11 countries are moving forward with similar plans That includes the key countries of Germany and France and in England, where it is called a “Robin Hood tax,” or a Tobin tax, named for James Tobin, an economist who first proposed the idea.
There will be arguments against it, as there are on any new tax. But it moves toward collecting a tax on an industry that generally is not taxed, yet is central to commerce and thrives with hordes of profits. It also can discourage day-traders and others into heavy trading.
As a comparison, buy a new car, and you’re heavily taxed. Spend $20,000 for that car, and the sales tax is $1,200 (six percent in Gwinnett.) You really pay a minimum of $21,200 for the vehicle (plus your tag fee.) Or go to any retail store, say a clothing store, and spend $400, and you end up paying $424.
But buy $10,000 in stock in the Southern Company, or General Electric, Agco, Rock-Tenn, or any shares in any company, and there is no transaction tax. Under the Harkin-DeFazio plan, your tax on buying $10,000 in stock would be $3. That sounds small. But when you add up the many stock transfers across the nation, it comes to the enormous $35.2 billion a year.
Many, many Americans, that is those not in the stock market, would never pay this tax. It “taxes the rich” in one way of thinking, though not at a very high level.
Keep listening. You should be hearing more about this new thought on taxation, both in this country, and in Europe.
- Editor's note: This story originally published at the GwinnettForum.com.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
A few of us borrowed a friend's cabin up near Blue Ridge and drove up for the weekend, took the scenic route through Dahlonega, Blairsville and up 19 to 76. Something uplifting about the mountains. We navigated those winding roads slower than the traffic behind us would have preferred but it was a safe speed and very visually engaging, what with the roadside leaves gone for winter. The distant ridge lines were accessible to hungry eyes and the slopes themselves were similarly denuded, kind of raw, primeval maybe. Puts you in touch with the old profound being thing that Jung Read on →
You knew in the beginning it was folly, no good -- like that girl who lived around the corner your Momma said was "fast." “She's gonna take your money and your stomp on your heart,” Momma said. You knew it too ... but you went anyway. YOU You promised yourself you would not get involved this time. You knew all about the probabilities ... the impossibilities, really. You knew all about the odds against success, heard Nate Silver -- or somebody -- use $5 words like “implacable,” “infinitesimal” and “asymptotic” to assure Charlie Rose the odds were ridiculous. And yes, you knew it was a Fool's Notion Read on →
Before I fell asleep last night, my wife Jody read aloud to me from her copy of Barbara Kingsolver’s book The Lacuna. The passage she chose was a diary entry that opened: “Tonight’s news: the Allies broke open the dikes along the Netherlands coast, letting in the open sea and drowning thousands of German soldiers in the flood. Like the Azteca opening dikes to drown Cortés and his men on the shores of Lake Tenochtitlan. But fiction is nonsense, the war is real. Tomorrow the farmers of Walcheren will wake to see a tide standing over their crops, the floating corpses of the Read on →
The modern oil industry, vertically integrated exploration, extraction, refining and distribution of oil on a mass scale, began no later than 1825 in Tsarist Russia. In 1825 Russia produced 3500 tons of crude and refined it, mostly into kerosene. By 1850 the Russian output had doubled to over 7000 tons. By 1906 Russia had a pipeline over 400 miles long stretching from the oil fields in Azerbaijan to the Black Sea port of Batumi, the first major pipeline in the world. By the 1900 there were great strides being taken to develop oil fields in the United States and at Read on →