- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
No public lands in Texas?
I don’t know if that’s true, but it may account for why Dr. James Kroll has moved on up to Wisconsin to become the Deer Czar and convert Wisconsin’s public lands into private enclaves so the deer herds can be more properly managed and controlled. As if there weren’t enough reasons already for Governor Scott Walker to be recalled!
If you love deer hunting you better vote out Walker!!! Walker is currently in the process of creating a system where public hunting lands will be turned over to private companies. Walker’s Texas Deer Czar (Dr. James Kroll) is in charge of making the transition within the next 18 months. Wealthy people from Minnesota and Illinois want public hunting lands “regulated” because they complained to Walker about not having enough deer.
http://www.deeranddeerhunting.com/featured/will-wisconsin-privatize-public-land — From “Dogwood” in his comments on a story on Chippewa.com
Not everyone agrees that this is a bad idea.
Put a stop to government interference and control of deer hunting. The current system of government regulated deer hunting allows people to bag a $750, $1,000 or $8,000 buck for $24. How is that fair? If this is not communism, it at least is socialism Dr. James Kroll did call public game management “the last bastion of communism.” Sometimes the truth hurts. — From “CJNelson” in his comments on a story on Chippewa.com
Democrats keep wondering why the citizens in the so-called “red states” keep voting against their own interests. I suspect it’s because they do not know that looking out for each other and sharing the common wealth of public lands is the “socialism” which the champions of individualism and private equity aim to eliminate. They do not realize that the reason public revenues are being stinted by the money bags is because there are still some public assets their lordships do not yet control.
- public parks
- public highways
- public libraries
- public schools
- public transit
- public housing
- public buildings
- public records
- public hearings
These are all just the tip of the iceberg, the visible part of what is sought to be eliminated once and for all — i.e. popular interference, except for an occasional ballot contest, in how the affairs of state are run.
Of course, government by the people or “populism,” as some politicians characterize it, wasn’t an issue until every adult citizen got the right to vote in 1971, the same year, purely a coincidence, Richard Nixon got rid of the artificial limits imposed by gold on the dollars we use to mediate and facilitate our trade. If people in the streets scared their lordships in 1968, imagine what the prospect of unrestricted access to money by the general public did.
One thing putting a dollar value on all assets, public and private, did was make it apparent that the traditional wholesale transfer of public goods into private wealth would have to stop. Which is why what the railroad magnates and coal barons and cattle ranchers used to be able to acquire with hardly anyone being the wiser is now being resisted in the name of conservation and environmental protection and reducing pollution. If Dr. Kroll refers to them as “cocktail conservationists,” he’s cleverly appealing to people who don’t drink alcohol and aren’t supposed to notice that their natural resources are being fenced off.
He calls national parks “wildlife ghettos”.
That’s another clever turn of phrase designed to turn people, many of whom no longer have the time or money to even visit their public lands, off. Funny how conservatives keep coming up with phrases whose parts cancel each other out. Must be a particular mindset to prevaricate like that.
No public lands in Texas? That would explain not only Dr. Deer’s relocation but how it happened that the biggest nuclear waste dump is being set up there.
Of course, if Governor Walker is fired mid-term, then that will be more evidence public service is risky because people who mess up can be held to account, contrary to the myth the lords of privacy try to spread.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
There’s something about being a writer that leads people to confide in me. Think about that. Why tell a writer, a person who uses life itself as raw material, your deepest secrets. But tell me they do, and sometimes their secrets break my heart. Through my writing and books, I meet a lot of people. Some become friends. I’ve come to know women who confided in me just how much they hated their father. They had reason. So they say. Several told me how hard life was with an alcoholic father. Others talked about how abusive their dads were, and some fel Read on →
That is the 21st Century question. Whether agents of government are tasked with telling the public what to do or, as the United States Constitution suggests, are to limit themselves to prohibiting socially injurious behaviors by individuals and corporations. Republicans, being descendants of royalists, whose model of social organization is the family with its paternalistic head of household, continue to hold fast to the belief that their fellow man needs to be strictly ruled. Because people doing their own thing make them feel really insecure. This is what accounts for the sudden resurgence of legislation all over the country, some organized by Read on →
There are many congressional districts where Democrats have nearly zero chance of winning anytime soon. The recent victory of the disgraced Mark Sanford in a South Carolina congressional race shows how safe a Republican seat can be. The difficulty of winning these seats, paradoxically, presents an important opportunity for Democrats. In the short run, the political battle in America is over who will hold the offices where laws get made. In the long run, the battle is over shaping the public consciousness that determines to whom the people will give power. For the latter purpose, Democrats in very red districts can make an Read on →
Could there be a more appropriate monument to the War in Terror than the wasteful and counterproductive prison camp at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base? At a cost of $4,360.00 a day per prisoner, it is among the most expensive lock-ups on the planet and surely the most expensive for inmates who are neither deposed heads of state nor leaders of defeated rebellions. (For that amount you could book a Premier Suite at the Ritz Carleton Central Park and still have a thousand dollars left over to pay for dinner!) The cost in international reputation cannot be calculated in dollars but there Read on →