- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
Take & Take
The Conservative Dilemma
Government by the people is the ultimate DIY enterprise. Mainly, we benefit each other by taking turns. Conservatives are people who, for whatever reason, do not know where their interests lie. And, having no basis for comparison, aren’t able to divine others’ interests either. They are self-centered without being self-aware. From a societal perspective, they probably exist to be recipients of other people’s creative ministrations. After all, for the shoemaker to perfect his craft and experiment with style and design and criteria of comfort, he needs people other than himself to use his product.
Give and take. In the natural order of events, the giving comes first. However, self-centered people don’t perceive that. Perhaps that’s why classical economic theory starts from the assumption that trade and exchange is initiated by demand. This is nonsensical, since it is not possible to demand what doesn’t already exist. (It might be noteworthy that ExxonMobil has been running an ad to promote fracking for natural gas by asserting that “all it takes is the idea” to have enough energy “for a hundred years”). This misordering of events (which comes first and which comes second) apparently persists in the thinking of many people and presumably accounts, for the common injunction that it is up to the buyer to be wary of what he buys and to know what he’s getting — another logical impossibility. We can’t know before we experience. We can only expect and what we expect is not necessarily what we get.
All of these fine distinctions rely on the ability to perceive time as a linear process and remember the sequence of events. That is, it requires a sense of time and not everyone has that. Some people have no sense of past, present and future being distinct entities. They exist in an ineffable present where expectation and experience are one big muddle around an unstable center. It’s no wonder such people are discombobulated and insecure and want nothing more than that the familiar stay the same. Change is a disaster for them.
How can you take turns when you don’t know what time it is? How can you delay gratification when there is no future? How do such people even function? By responding to prompts and following their basic instincts –like a dog getting into its cage, regardless of whether it’s in the garage or on top of the car. If they thought about it, they’d know better.
- Photo: Licensed on iStock.com by LikeTheDew.com. © PK-Photos
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
In my first experience of euphoria, prelude to a bipolar life, I experienced an inspiration. It was exhilarating, profound, an insight that would not be possible in a normal frame of mind. I attempted without success to share this amazing revelation with others. Even my loved ones dismissed it as an example of my frame of mind that they would rather forget. One cannot blame them. If a saint walks into a prison and spreads a little happiness, he won’t be perceived as a saint, more like a ‘decent bloke.’ I am not ‘a nutcase’, but that is how people perceive Read on →
That is the 21st Century question. Whether agents of government are tasked with telling the public what to do or, as the United States Constitution suggests, are to limit themselves to prohibiting socially injurious behaviors by individuals and corporations. Republicans, being descendants of royalists, whose model of social organization is the family with its paternalistic head of household, continue to hold fast to the belief that their fellow man needs to be strictly ruled. Because people doing their own thing make them feel really insecure. This is what accounts for the sudden resurgence of legislation all over the country, some organized by Read on →
There are many congressional districts where Democrats have nearly zero chance of winning anytime soon. The recent victory of the disgraced Mark Sanford in a South Carolina congressional race shows how safe a Republican seat can be. The difficulty of winning these seats, paradoxically, presents an important opportunity for Democrats. In the short run, the political battle in America is over who will hold the offices where laws get made. In the long run, the battle is over shaping the public consciousness that determines to whom the people will give power. For the latter purpose, Democrats in very red districts can make an Read on →
"Nothing but the best for our students." "Education is key to the future." "Our students must compete with the brightest in China." You've heard remarks like this before, often from educators and elected officials. But the reality is far different from these remarks. We've found that a majority of the counties in Georgia provide less than the state-mandated 180 days of instruction for their county students. Can you imagine that you could provide "nothing but the best" by shortchanging the number of days students are in school? It's happening. Take a look at the adjacent map. The orange counties are providing 180 days of instruction. Read on →