- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
Fixing the Ecomony #1
Open the Federal Reserve discount window to states and local government. This initiative uses no taxpayer money, requires no action from Congress, could be implemented immediately and should save state and local governments, as much as $80-$100 billion, each year while providing badly needed economic stimulus or tax relief. In DC, this would be spun, “a trillion dollar stimulus over ten years.”
We already give access to the Fed’s discount window to banks – even non-member foreign banks (yes, among many others, Gaddafi-controlled, Central Bank of Libya-owned, Arab Banking Corp.); Wall Street and insurers of Wall Street including Goldman-Sachs, Morgan Stanley and AIG; and pseudo-banks/auto lenders including GMAC. Why not allow access for our sovereign state governments that are bound by balanced budget amendments - many of whom now have higher credit ratings than the US government?
Can we do that? Sure. The Federal Reserve has long held the authority to lend to anyone or anything during unusual and exigent circumstances – and the Fed defines the circumstances. Under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the Fed’s authority of extending credit has been changed from “specific individuals, partnerships and corporations” to also give access to “any program or facility with broad-based eligibility.”* Further, the Fed has authority to buy state and municipal securities directly (known as: quantitative easing).
Even without the emergency authority or the expanded authority, states have long been able to simply set up publicly-owned banks** for the specific purpose of Fed discount window access.
The Fed currently lends money from .015% to 1.25%. States and local government now have more than $2.8 trillion in bond debt*** – used to build roads, hospital, schools and universities, football stadiums for NFL teams, the infrequent mass transit project (liberal areas, only), infrastructure projects, attract industry, and other purposes. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports that these bonds cost 4-5% of annual expenditures and recently, typical rates are from 4%-6%.
The potential for fixing the economy, however, doesn’t stop there. Individual states would have authority to use its access to the Fed discount window to finance utility construction and lower costs for consumers (according to the AJC, those in Georgia who will be subject to a $9 a month financing charge for the expansion at Plant Vogtle are ideal beneficiaries). Each state could use lower rate access to provide businesses with capital to expand and create jobs, financing to consumers for environmental improvement, offer lower cost student loans to its citizens, financing for non-profits and a host of other initiatives.
Is it inflationary? Sure, but when growth is at 1%, no worries.
Does it compete with the private sector financing? Yes, but to consider that bad, one should consider that most private financing is done with access to the Fed window and one would also have to answer why taxpayers should pay more?
Will it take a chunk of most lusted-after income out of the pockets of the greedy “masters of the universe” Wall Street investment bankers and hedge funders? Sure, and wouldn’t that be great?
As a by-product, wouldn’t it increase state and federal tax revenues, since so many wealthy investors use municipal bonds to make tax free income? Yep.
Wouldn’t former mayors, council people, senators and legislators who go into the lucrative bond business leveraging their former patronage to call in favors have to find another way to fleece taxpayers after they get out of office? Yes, that, too.
Wouldn’t it help Democrats more than Republicans? I doubt it. The Fed is not political and there are an awful lot of Republican governors who’d jump at the chance to have a little more room in their budgets. Most of those helped would be in the jobs it would save and the new jobs that could be created – jobs regardless of party affiliation.
Author’s note: This is first in a series of commonsense things we can do to fix our economy during this time when the House and Senate can agree on nothing. I invite your comment and suggestions.
Update: The article was updated on 8/8/11 at 1:42 PM.
* Whatever the hell this could possibly mean will eventually be known when Congress approves the 4,000 rules to govern implementation of this bill. Until then, it is anyone’s guess.
** “In North Dakota, the publicly owned Bank of North Dakota (BND) acts as a “mini-Fed” for the state. Like the Federal Reserve of the 1930s and 1940s, the BND makes loans to local businesses and participates in loans made by local banks. The BND has helped North Dakota escape the credit crisis. In 2009, when other states were teetering on bankruptcy, North Dakota sported the largest surplus it had ever had. Other states, prompted by their own budget crises to explore alternatives, are now looking to North Dakota for inspiration.” – ZeroHedge.com
*** General obligation bonds (GOs), Revenue bonds, Conduit bonds, Insured bonds, Original Issue Discount bonds, Taxable bonds, Zero coupon bonds, Pre-Refunded bonds, Escrowed-to-Maturity (ETM) bonds, Housing bonds, Municipal Notes. Current total outstanding is a very difficult figure to come up with. The figure of $2.8 trillion is from Wall Street investment company estimates. The US Census Bureau’s Statistical Abstract was last updated for state and local government debt in 2007 (totaling almost $2.5 trillion), but does not include many types of municipal debt. Dependent upon the purpose, these instruments may or may not be tax free.
This work by LikeTheDew.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
That’s what the spouse said when I wrote him how surprised and disappointed I was to discover that Michelle Nunn has gratuitously endorsed the XL pipeline from Canada, because buying oil from “neighbors” is better than from overseas, as well as to read a report that Nunn wants changes to Obamacare to allow cheaper policies for the young. Like they don’t have car accidents and sports injuries, etc? (Read the other day that there’s a chance auto and workmen’s comp insurance rates are going to decrease now that people have health insurance. Ripple effect). He went on to observe that “Kenny and Tracy hav Read on →
"Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." -- Matthew 6:21. On April 4, 1967, exactly one year before he was assassinated, Martin Luther King, Jr. made public his opposition to the Vietnam War, articulated in his iconic "Beyond Vietnam" speech. Presented at Riverside Church in New York City, "Beyond Vietnam" was the most controversial speech King ever delivered. In it, he confronted head-on America's "triple evils" -- racism, economic injustice, and militarism -- and called for "a radical revolution of values" to restore our nation's integrity. Afterwards, many supporters, black and white, abandoned him for daring to mix the Read on →
Ever hear of "due diligence?" That's a term often seen in business stories, particularly when public accountants are working at checking the financial background of companies who might want to buy or sell to one another. Some people at the University of Georgia apparently don't understand or use the term "due diligence," especially when it comes to recruiting football players. One group defines "due diligence" in two ways: 1. An investigation or audit of a potential investment. Due diligence serves to confirm all material facts in regards to a sale. 2. Generally, due diligence refers to the care a reasonable person should take before Read on →
You knew in the beginning it was folly, no good -- like that girl who lived around the corner your Momma said was "fast." “She's gonna take your money and your stomp on your heart,” Momma said. You knew it too ... but you went anyway. YOU You promised yourself you would not get involved this time. You knew all about the probabilities ... the impossibilities, really. You knew all about the odds against success, heard Nate Silver -- or somebody -- use $5 words like “implacable,” “infinitesimal” and “asymptotic” to assure Charlie Rose the odds were ridiculous. And yes, you knew it was a Fool's Notion Read on →