- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
Civility in America?
“All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals.” – Joshua Lederberg
And how those individuals rage these days. They hurl accusations, taunts, threats and self-righteous assertions. They feed their opinions into the gullets of a willing populace and the media laps up the rank dribble. They storm about, damning those whose opinions may differ from theirs. They “rail against the machine” (which “machine” depends upon the day, the time and the speaker’s position).
And in this age of technology, they quickly take to the vast and unfettered realm of cyberspace. There they often hide behind a cloak of anonymity; lies, rumors, smear-campaigns… all spewed out into the world with little thought to either truth or consequences.
From the international stage to national forums and down to the small theaters of local affairs, people appear to be becoming increasingly intolerant of opposing views and all too ready to fire at will.
It seems to be the case that, with increasing frequency, the very people who defend “free speech” most vehemently are those who then defile that scared concept by using the spoken or written word to pummel “the opposition” into silence. With an American flag in one hand, the Constitution in the other and, quite often, a Bible clenched between their teeth, they hunch over their keyboards or microphones and use any means available to decimate open debate.
According to Professor Steven Carter (Yale Law School) “Civility is the total of all the sacrifices we make for others, the sacrifices we make for the sake of living in community with others. Those sacrifices are important, because we rub up against each other all the time, all day long. We cannot live simply as individuals who seek our own desires and self-indulgence.”
Let’s consider one small case in point: a town in America where many of the citizens grew concerned about the activities of their City Council. One would have thought that it would be considered admirable for people to speak up, ask questions, seek answers and become proactive in affairs that affect the well-being of their community. One would have thought.
Enter the clamoring and enraged throng. The online community forums went wild with menacing, obscene and ignorant comments; strange websites intentionally promulgate lies and patently ridiculous rumors spread like toxic weeds; individuals are attacked, livelihoods threatened, families affected and a town divided. (Oddly, those who most vociferously damn the people who sought answers through the appropriate channels and maintained their decorum call them “anti-American.” Their “logic” escapes me).
“94% of all Americans consider the general tone and level of civility in the country today to be a problem.” The study further finds that “the tone of incivility is causing Americans to tune out from the most fundamental elements of our society – government and politics, news coverage and reporting, and opinion pieces and editorials in newspapers and magazines.” – From the Weber Shandwick study, “Civility in America”.
Herein awaits, perhaps, the greatest danger: the “tuning out.” If the tenor of debate becomes so discordant, rabid and off-putting, people will simply close their eyes and ears. They will choose to narrow their fields of vision to that which lies directly before them and will cease participating in “the process.” Already appallingly low voter-turn-out rates will continue to plummet and the tapestry of democracy will unravel. We are witnessing it in the same town mentioned above as citizens become reluctant to volunteer for the boards and committees so necessary for the success of any society. They are unwilling to become the latest victims of cyber-smears and gossip. Incivility is already taking a formidable toll.
There are those who protest this disturbing trend. James Leach, the Chairman of The National Endowment for the Humanities launched a fifty-state American Civility Tour to call attention to the need for civility in public discourse. According to Leach,
“Civilization requires civility. Words matter. Polarizing attitudes can jeopardize social cohesion.”
The Dilenschneider Group, a strategic communications firm, is partnering with the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs to present a series of lectures about the need for civility. From Robert L. Dilenschneider, president of the Dilenschneider Group.:
“Today, the virtue of civility has been abandoned in the United States. As a result, there is strife throughout America – screaming blogs, political attacks, vicious reader comments, and the inability to work across the legislative aisle without rancor or demeaning acrimony.”
These are but two of the countless efforts to create a new dialog about the importance of civility.
Perhaps some consider it mere cosmetics – the meaningless prettying up of everyday discourse. I consider civility the glue that holds us together and propels us forward as a nation. Diverse opinions serve to expand our knowledge, increase our tolerance and reaffirm our commitment to the ideals embodied by article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This freedom is compromised if we must fear that our words will be met with the thuggish attacks of those who would silence all dissenting voices.
Disagree if you will (as is your right)… but be civil. Perhaps then we can meet in the middle.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
More than a century ago the “forgotten man” of Mississippi and across the South — the farmer, the common worker — decided he’d had enough of “Wall Street speculators who gambled on his crop futures; the railroad owners who evaded his taxes, bought legislatures, and over-charged him with discriminate rates; the manufacturers, who taxed him with a high tariff; the trusts that fleeced him with high prices; the middleman, who stole his profit.” The forgotten man was so angry, historian C. Vann Woodward goes on to say, that he created a movement. It came as close to toppling our two-party system as any effort Read on →
How did it come to this? How did our political life in America get to be so drenched in hostility? While reading an article about how “anti-environmentalists” are spending thousands of dollars to alter their vehicles to increase the smoke they produce, I came across this statement from one of that group, who call themselves “coal rollers”: “If [Obama’s] into the environment, if he’s into this or that, we’re not.” And it’s not just the president they’re hostile to, it’s also those Prius-driving “librels” who, according to the article, might be specially targeted with a blast of smoke and soot. How did “if they’re for it, I’m agi Read on →
One night about three years ago when Jake was five, I was settling him to sleep with a book about Chicken Licken. I hadn’t met her before but Jake knew her well. When we got to the end of the book and he asked for another story, I was too tired to fetch another book, and didn’t want to disturb his sleepy state, so I made up a variation on this theme. We lay with our eyes closed, imagining. Taking the character’s name in vain, we casually began to invent life situations and adventures for Chicken Licken. “Chicken Licken goes to school” Read on →
But the sacred is something that Liberal America, by and large, has not been tapping into. That was not always true. One can sense the sacred in the words of FDR, for example, engraved in the granite in that memorial on the National Mall. (And FDR was not shy about going toe to toe against his enemies, whether it be to help make the nation a better place or to stop the predations of the fascist powers against much of the world.) That was then. But if one listens to the voice of Liberal America in these times, one does not get Read on →