- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
No political downside for nay sayers like Jim DeMint
That’s what one almost has to conclude after perusing the McClatchy review of how the Party of No, including South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint, nay sayer and ObamaCare slayer par excellence, continue to dis their constituents in the interest of remaining ideologically pure.
“Senator DeMint opposed President Obama’s government takeover of health care because he believed it would lead to higher insurance premiums, less choices for patients, and that it was unconstitutional,” said DeMint spokesman Wesley Denton. “And that’s exactly what has happened, and why ObamaCare must be repealed.”
Perhaps the Senator from South Carolina perceives himself in a contest with President Obama and that accounts for the enhancement of Obama’s role. In fact, of course, private insurance corporations continue to play middleman between doctor and patient and, while the feel-good program formerly known as Medicare Advantage has been significantly scaled back, providing for health and welfare can’t possibly be unconstitutional. But, if you’re out to slay an imaginary dragon, it would be silly not to paint it gigantic.
In any event, one year after its passage, reviews of the Affordable Care Act are coming in and are mostly positive, especially from the recipients of $1 billion in Therapeutic Discovery Grants. These grants have obviously been distributed on the basis of merit, rather than the stature of the Senator or Congressman who represents the recipients’ district. And that may well be the crux of the problem for folks like De Mint of South Carolina and Cornyn of Texas–merit based grants that don’t have to be paid back provide no opportunity to extort support, either in the form of campaign contributions, or guaranteed votes at election time.
Being contrary works in unexpected ways. While a ‘no’ vote, being certain, is undeniably attractive to insecure people who specialize in avoiding risk, caution can be thrown to the wind when it comes to claiming a share in any success. (How often have we heard Republicans crow that their opposition made whatever Democrats accomplished better?) And then, of course, there are the voters in whom hope springs eternal and the “benefit of the doubt” is always eager to trot out when, the next time around, the politician claims to have found the light. Nobody’s keen to admit they elected a dolt.
On the other hand, people who sign on to be stewards of the country’s resources and assets ought not to be given a pass. After all, while denying themselves and resisting profligate behavior is admirable in every sense, depriving the people they represent of access to their own public assets actually verges on abuse. It’s not even a matter of “hiding one’s talents under a bushel,” which Jesus decried; it’s withholding that to which people are entitled or, even worse, distributing their assets to someone else, not unlike the dishonest steward, writing down his master’s debtors debts, when he knew he was about to be sacked. It’s a clever ploy, being generous with what belongs to someone else. That’s triangulation at its best. But public servants ought not to be allowed to get away with it.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
Modern mankind may be too clean, that is, not dirty enough. That may surprise you. Today we take personal hygiene to be a standard in the developed world, not only healthy, but also a state which gracious people routinely adopt. It hasn't always been so. As close back as 100-200 years ago, cleansing yourself on a regular basis might mean a semi-annual or monthly bath. Royalty of the days of old thought that the long-hanging germs on your body fought off disease, and kept you healthy. Hence, few baths. From the year 1075, one monk living in Cluny, wrote: "As to our baths, Read on →
For some reason, a letter from the lobbying arm of the Heritage Foundation was characterized as having been received by NBC News, as if it were some sort of privileged communication. In fact, the thing was a press release and rather obviously designed to change the conversation about the Heritage Foundation from trying to defend the indefensible "study" of Hispanic intellectual insufficiency to food stamps, a real two-fer issue. Two-fer in the sense of being offensive on two fronts since the dollars doled out represent a subsidy to industrial agriculture, even as they serve to remind the indigent that, if they're Read on →
I can recommend a few days in Ireland to reset your clock: geographically, politically, economically and culturally. For those hazy about geography, Ireland is on the northwest edge of Europe. Clouds traversing the ocean from America absorb Atlantic moisture, dumping it at first landfall; hence Ireland’s rainy climate and its reputation as The Emerald Isle. I’m here for two weeks holiday, flying Dulles to Dublin with the son I live near in Virginia. He’s bound for England on business. Arriving at Dublin’s beautiful modern airport (built just before the financial collapse of 2008) one appreciates how the 1990’s engendered a sense of boom and Read on →
I had an interesting morning yesterday at the Free Clinic. Once a week I’m a Spanish interpreter in an organization supported by over 400 volunteers who give a few hours a week of their particular expertise in a smoothly run team. We cater for patients with chronic conditions needing regular medication, having no access to health insurance. Yesterday we met a new patient who is deaf and mute since birth. We took her through her eligibility interview with a social worker, then a nurse took her health history, followed by a doctor's consultation and a laboratory test. In the seven years I Read on →