- Important: All passwords were reset on 06/15/11. Old passwords will no longer work. Click here to retrieve your password.
- Subscribe to Our Free Dewsletter
We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.
Reduce The Deficit: Tax The Baby Boomers
We were blessed, well, maybe blessed is not the correct word here, with a broad overview of the sweeping changes proposed by the leaders of the Deficit Reduction Panel this week. Frankly, in looking over the details, I agree with Gerald Seib, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal, who wrote, “Deficit-Cutting Chairmen Call Washington’s Bluff.” However, I would take his statement even further because the Chairmen are also challenging all of us, in particular the right. As I said last week, campaigning is the easy part. Now the Tea must be poured. These newly elected representatives will be required to detail specifics of spending cuts and government funding. No longer can they get along with bumper sticker statements that sound so good. They are about to touch the third rail of politics.
Is it possible to significantly reduce our federal deficit without an increase in revenue? As the right tries to tell us, can we pay fewer taxes and reduce the debt and maintain fundamental services? The Deficit Panel says no to both questions. The Chairmen told both parties, and us, to get our heads out of the sand because any changes are going to involve significant pain. The simplistic 20% solution – reducing all federal department budgets (except defense) by 20% – is a coward’s solution. No critical decisions have to be made about what programs should be eliminated. It is a “solution” that gives the bureaucrats the power to decide what to cut so that Congress can vilify them and claim that is not what they meant to cut. We already see it on a state level. It has been the preferred method of budget cutting by the Georgia legislature. So much for political accountability. The 20% “solution” is a typical political dodge.
Unfortunately, when you look at the deficit reduction plan proposed by the panel, it is the middle and lower classes that get creamed – and hard. Yes, they do lower both individual and corporate tax rates but, in exchange, most deductions are eliminated, including home mortgage interest. Current Social Security benefits are slated to be cut and “wealthier” individuals will have their Social Security benefits means tested. Where the line will be drawn to separate the wealthy from the non-wealthy is anybody’s guess at this point. Medicare will be slashed, discretionary spending cut by $410 billion by 2015, and the federal workforce cut by 10%. Defense and Homeland Security agencies would see a $100 billion reduction.
On the positive side, earmarks would be banned. Right now, it looks like Republicans are going to duke it out on that issue. Georgia has two senators that are big on pork. Saxby Chambliss even ran on a platform of bringing home the bacon just a few short years ago and won overwhelmingly.
Now here is the most interesting part. Whereas the panel is proposing $3.8 trillion in budget cuts, that is only HALF of the projected $7.7 trillion INCREASE in debt by 2020 – resulting in a federal deficit of $17.5 trillion ($13.7 trillion currently plus projected $3.8 trillion) in 2020. The overwhelming burden is going to be placed on the very children and grandchildren we hear so much about.
Here is how I see it. These huge deficits have been brought on by the baby boomer generation and their irresponsibility spending. As a result, the baby boomers should not be coddled now with a pretend stab at the deficit, leaving the biggest burden to their children. In addition to these significant budget cuts, taxes should be raised on the baby boomers. They should have to pay for their irresponsibility now, and not leave such a financial mess to their children. Everybody should stop whining about the deficit and step up to the plate. There is no reason to shunt the deficit down the road. Increase taxes on baby boomers now and raise corporate taxes as well. Corporations have a responsibility to contribute to democracy just as the rest of us.
Worthy of Comment
Also on the Dew
For some reason, a letter from the lobbying arm of the Heritage Foundation was characterized as having been received by NBC News, as if it were some sort of privileged communication. In fact, the thing was a press release and rather obviously designed to change the conversation about the Heritage Foundation from trying to defend the indefensible "study" of Hispanic intellectual insufficiency to food stamps, a real two-fer issue. Two-fer in the sense of being offensive on two fronts since the dollars doled out represent a subsidy to industrial agriculture, even as they serve to remind the indigent that, if they're Read on →
My beloved colleagues in Teh Media sure get on my last damn nerve. Most of the time it's just from sloppy work or jumping on whatever bandwagon is rolling by at the time, something along the lines of a pet peeve. Like when my Twitter list of political reporters blows up with some hashtag meme instead of actual reporting. Today it's #Obamacareinthreewords, launched by that icon of credibility, Rep. Darrell Issa. It's the second time around for that one -- Rep. Kevin McCarthy launched it the first time last June. (@WhiteHouse even got in on it, tweeting "It's.The.Law." Republicans responded with "arrogance Read on →
When music publisher John Stark first heard Scott Joplin play his piano, he knew that ragtime was the music of hope for a new America. But Joplin would never be content with popularity and fame. Joplin committed himself to racial justice in the early 1900’s. He was inspired by Booker T. Washington and the Dahomeyan defeat in West Africa. But due to this earnest pursuit, he was ignored by the masses for writing the music of Civil Rights fifty years before America was ready to listen. King of Rags, by Professor Eric Bronson, is a historical fiction account of the quest for r Read on →
As it says in my by-line, in the several items I've posted previously on "Like the Dew," I recently ran for Congress. But I am not a politician, nor possessed of a personal ambition to hold public office. I ran, rather, because for the past nine years I have had a message that I regard as so urgent that I've been willing to do whatever I can to spread it far and wide in order to persuade my fellow citizens of its truth and importance. I believe that for the past decade or so America has faced a crisis as pr Read on →