Follow us: Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Google+ Follow us on Linkedin Follow us on Vodpod Follow us on Tumblr Subscribe to our RSS or Atom feed
Thursday, May 17, 2012

Views DewTubes

Click to view more DewTubes – fresh most days
Watch videos at Vodpod and more of my videos




Last Call for Martyrs Ya’ll

by | 18, Add your Comment | Jul 13, 2010

After having a few beers around a campfire, a disciple asked, “What do you think is the best way to impact the most lives?”

I thought for a moment, shrugged and replied, “Suicide bomber.”

Martyrs come in all shapes and sizes. Some wore chainmail and big red crosses on their tunics. Others used airplanes to plow into warships. More recently, folks like to pack vests full of C-4 and a few hundred nails or marbles and strap them to their chests.

According to a report conducted by Reuters in 2007, an estimated 2,360 persons were killed by about 37 suicide bombers in Iraq between February of 2004 and August of 2007. That’s 63.9 victims (not including the wounded) per martyr.

Kamikaze pilots, whose name means “divine wind,”  delivered over 2,800 airborne strikes against U.S. warships during World War 2. Their results: 34 ships sunk, 368 damaged, 4,900 Navy personnel killed and another 4,800 wounded (Dr. Richard P Hallion, 1999, “Precision Weapons, Power Projection, and the Revolution in Military Affairs”, USAF Historical Studies Office). That’s one pilot for every 1.75 U.S. Navy personnel killed, and one for every 3.46 casualties total. These numbers do not take into account the effects of kamikaze attacks on the naval vessels of other Allied nations or the Japanese ground-based suicide methods known as “banzai charges.”

Few other weapons deliver a more demoralizing and efficient blow than the martyr hell-bent on success.

Many view such actions and violence with disgust, fear, and condemnation. Favorite adjectives include “fanatics,” “fundamentalist,” “radicals,” and “indoctrinated.” Surely these sadistic automatons deserve only a straightjacket and a liberal dose of “free love.”

The Western world, and more specifically the U.S., has their own heroes and banzai warriors. Martin Luther King, Jr., partially inspired by fellow martyr Mahatma Ghandi, stood for civil rights, relief for the poor and racial equality. He gave himself completely to the non-violent protest of injustice and paid for this effort with his life.

Remember the Spartans? Hollywood loves a good sacrifice yarn, and what would be more dramatic, more climactic than 300 scantily clad Greeks handing it to wave after wave of barbaric Persians? Their deed (as well as the lesser acknowledged sea battle in the Artimisium Straits) is credited to have persevered a burgeoning Western civilization and by extension, democracy itself.

An epitaph bearing the following words marks the pass called Thermopylae where the battle took place:

“Go tell the Spartans, passerby: That here, by Spartan law, we lie.” (Frank Miller, 300).

Sound familiar? Modern political commentators love quoting isolated passages in the Qur’an that call for sacrifice and “death to the infidel” as proof of Islam’s obsession with the establishment of the Ummah. A similar case is found with the Christian concept of Jesus returning to wipe out evil in the battle of Armageddon, and the Jews who patiently await a messiah to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem and restore the kingdom of Israel.

Of course, these are but a few examples of groups whose interpretation of scripture is used to mold history. It’s all relative.

But there is some light here, a positive grain of truth amidst this dark stain on humanity. What if we stopped arguing over one man’s hero being another man’s fanatic and glean a lesson from this mess? One thing these individuals have in common is that they possess a selfless, unadulterated resolve and cold, polished, balls (ovaries for the ladies) of steel.

When was the last time you stood up for something? How much would it hurt to surrender your ego to something larger than yourself, to demote yourself to a column instead of that which rests on top?

When’s the last time you were a martyr?

Think it’s hard? Damn straight it is. Consider the single mom working three jobs for little more than the hope that her kids will have a life better than her? How about the monk who sets himself on fire to protest an injustice? Take the pastor, rabbi, imam, or priest on call virtually 24-7 to serve and council their communities—often negating their own families. Then there’s the soldier who for no better reason than brotherly love, lobs himself onto a grenade to save his comrade. Notice that there are no guarantees for success here. Then again, that isn’t the point.

None of them probably think too much about the cost of their sacrifice. They live in the moment. A requirement for action is involved and becomes instinctual. Their reward is in the security, pleasure, and well-being of others and yes, this disposition exists even in those who use martyrdom for destruction. This might have been what Jesus talked about when he asked us to love our neighbors as ourselves, or why the bodhavistas sacrifice nirvana lifetime after lifetime to help others. The energy of a martyr possesses the same properties as fire, electricity, or even words, and therefore to be of any benefit must be channeled in a peaceful and altruistic way.

Can you think of something or someone to give yourself to without thought of reward that would contribute to a better world? You could start by getting more involved in your children’s lives. Volunteer at a literacy center. Stand up for someone who at one time you might have considered an enemy. Buy another round for a stranger down on their luck. Tip the waiter at least fifteen percent.

Ready to do this? The following passage will get you started. We’ll call it “The Martyr’s Creed”, a mantra if you will, to help acclimate yourself to the martyr’s mindset.

“A martyr’s peace is absolute zero. Not a lack of warmth, but within and without, a profound stasis. Her aura glows, like lightning shrouded in clouds. Each crystalline thought passes through her mind at a glacial pace like a Sunday morning drive. Every synaptic burst unfurls in arcs of light, articulating frame by frame, before collapsing into the void.”

Say this three times fast, every morning as you shave or apply make-up. Embrace the flame of change and compassion and ignite in a phosphorous glow of selfless glory. Indeed, when you help just one person, when you pour your heart and being into a noble task, the whole world at that very moment rests in your hands.

So raise your glasses, my dirty masses. This is the Kingdom of Heaven, the Utopia of lore that is on the cusp of reality if we would only have faith in ourselves. All it will cost is your life, sweat, and love without regret.  Hell, there might even be a pat on the back and a cold beer set aside in Paradise as compensation for your efforts.

###
Andrew Bowen

About Andrew Bowen

Andrew's fiction and non-fiction deals with often muddy waters of theology and has appeared in places like Metazen, On the Wing, decomP, Nanoism, and more. He is the founding editor of Divine Dirt Quarterly and blogs at The Dirty Prophet.

 

Print Friendly

 

  • http://leslieevanscreative.com Lee Leslie

    Andrew, this is a great post. Selfless acts for family, community and ideals have gotten such bad press of late in our land of greed, aggrandizement, narcissism, jingoism, libertarianism, etc. Thank you for sharing. A must read on the Dew.

  • http://www.littlewallaby.com Frank Povah

    Thank you Andrew. As Lee says, required reading. But – and I apologize for this, I just can’t help myself – why do we humans insist on the promise of one sort of Paradise or another as a reward for exercising one of the greatest traits of our humanity?

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Thanks fellas. Frank, I understand your issue with a promise of Paradise. It’s a shame that many of us require this cost analysis is order to act, but it remains true. I’m obviously more in favor of turning a blind eye toward reward but hey, if it gets people in motion, what the hell.

  • http://notfromhereareyou.blogspot.com/ Michael J. Solender

    Andrew,

    A simply excellent post with much to ponder and put our arms around.

    While many in today’s world may in fact “possess a selfless, unadulterated resolve and cold, polished, balls (ovaries for the ladies) of steel”, my sense is that an equal number are simply naive, uneducated, impoverished and easily influenced young people who see nothing in their immediate field of vision worth living for. Promised compensation for their survivors, martyrdom and eternal Paradise, those facing life in a war-torn and ghettoized existence may see a suicidal act of terror as a viable option.

    It is more likely the very ones who profess the resolve and beliefs you speak of that find it more palatable for others to do their bidding. Hardly selfless.

    Absolutely nothing justifies terrorist actions done in the name of greater good as history continues to bear out.

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Absolutely Michael. And this post isn’t an end-all argument for martyrdom, but a door which opens into the new argument of subjectivity. Who is to decide what is a greater good? What sacrifices and what ends are justified universally? These are questions that echo long after this essay is read. My only hope is that the dialog continues, because silence on these matters is very deadly.

  • http://notfromhereareyou.blogspot.com/ Michael J. Solender

    Agreed. There are many selfless actions that don’t involve suicide or taking the lives of others and it is ironic that invariably many acting in selfless and higher purpose missions such as those involved in relief efforts are the very ones targeted -- as they are seen as representing a propagandists viewpoint. Dialogue and tolerance are key -- actions such as France considering a ban on Burkas and Arizona’s immigration laws simply put up divisive walls that will never bridge the gaps in cultures and understanding.

  • http://www.littlewallaby.com Frank Povah

    Education is a key -- it is harder to hate someone whose history and culture you understand.

  • Francois Lipton

    So you guys apologize for suicide bombers now? Really? Every time I think the cartoonish leftism broadcast on LikeTheDemocrats.com finds its steady state – a new contributor finds nether-regions of angry left-hand turns worthy of Mandelbrot himself. This essay finally reaches liberalism’s “happy ending” though: an emotive appeal supporting the wanton and arbitrary slaying of innocents for an undefined, reasonless cause. Leftism’s apotheosis.

    Why, Andrew, do you have an image of a child blindfolded and wielding a machine-gun to represent you to this sympathetic audience? That image is the definition of a failed society but apparently your dream for the one in which we live. You compare Martin Luther King and Ghandi favorably with Islamist suicide bombers and the 9/11 hijackers? Surely Ghandi and MLK did not view the prevailing social order benignly. They saw the world in very stark terms, right v. wrong. One man’s Raj may have been other’s Jim Crow but both men railed against the moral bankruptcy subjugating them – costing each his life. Terrorists aren’t heroes. They have no redeeming qualities whatsoever. They are the ultimate cowards. May they rot in Hell and their “steel balls” and ovaries melted slowly and fed to them.

    I know your heroes – the pizza joint, wedding and World Cup suicide bombers – have “a cause” but it is absolutely 100% wrong. Innocents die in conflicts of all sorts, but that behavior should never be apologized away. Warriors attempt to minimize collateral damage as a last resort to obtain a definable tactical objective, not multiply innocent deaths to “send a message.”

    The progressive mind seeks “being and nothingness” through subjectivism and relativism. Knowledge and standards are bourgeois and corrupt. Religion is dogma. In reality, progressive liberalism is simply a selfish and lazy indulgence. It’s why liberal progressives beg the state to solve their problems. It celebrates helplessness and victimhood and demands the state confiscate the fruits of productive workers. The progressive is an ignorant wretch consumed with self while that is the image he projects onto the world that rejects his bankrupt ideology. This essay’s celebration of mindless destruction makes that point nicely.

    • http://www.billyhoward.com Billy Howard

      Actually, you completely misread the article. Try again. You’re much too literal. Open up a bit, you might be happier. I know, I said I wouldn’t respond anymore, but now, I feel like I need to help you.

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Thanks Billy.

    He’s right, Francois. Take another look. The article starts with a little compare/contrast of different martyrs. You seem to be upset by the violent type. I don’t blame you. Did you notice anywhere in the essay where I condone folks blowing themselves up in the name of…who/whatever and taking innocents with them? Nope, you didn’t.

    This essay advocates putting others before yourself, altruism, to take the negative aspects of some martyrs and turn them into good.

    Oh, and my profile pic. I’m a writer. I enjoy irony and ambiguity. The picture is a satire of blind action. It’s okay, don’t let your blood pressure go too high.

    Peace pal,

    Andrew

    • Francois Lipton

      Andy: you write we should learn to find the good in suicide bombers who kill the innocent to inspire us by their sacrifices to help our fellow man. What kind of sick, absurd moral equivalence is that? There is nothing in these cowards to “turn them into good.” You say that’s not what you meant but that sure is what you wrote. I’m not the only one who noticed. Good to see you back away from those statements. I hope every single one of those sicko suicide bastards and the scumbags who recruit them die slow from butt cancer in a dark, moldy ass-pounding prison and then rots eternally in Hell.

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Didn’t back away. Let’s take a breath…

    I said we should learn from their mindset. I think your anger on this subject is clouding your judgement of my message. This is why I gave the examples of MLK and Ghandi and soldiers who throw themselves on grenades--not for the moral ground of the war they are fighting, but to save the guy next to them. In this essay, I’m asking level-headed folks to notice that all of these people have one thing in common: they put something above themselves and gave their all for it. I challenge good people to take the resolve and energy of a manic suicide bomber and use that force for good…like the numerous examples I provided. I’m putting people on notice who judge a sucide bomber but who lack the testicular fortitude to gives themselves up for a weekend or two to work a soup kitchen. Again, have a beer, chill a little.

    Not sure how you generated a negative context from my article, given the informationI sited and qualities I promote, but hey, it’s an opinion piece and you are certainly entitled to yours.

    Peace,

    Andrew

    • Francois Lipton

      “I challenge good people to take the resolve and energy of a manic suicide bomber and use that force for good.”

      As a matter of physical law, I dare say it takes more energy to construct a building, solve an equation, read a book, master a craft or make dinner for your family than it does to strap explosives to yourself and push a button to kill yourself. How can you possibly ascribe positive qualities to someone who walks aimlessly into a crowd of civilians to kill them. Such action takes no creative drive, no studied resolve — it’s just unhinged destructive emotional rage. People need to work to control their slides toward madness. I mean, if you recommend abandoning all self-restraint — why don’t we all just become lecherous alcoholics and drug addicts? That sounds more fun to me, anyway.

      “Learn from their mindset”? Of suicide bombers? Their mindset is exactly the problem. Their mindset is what one ought to condemn rather than make efforts to empathize or understand. Suicide bombers are deluded fanatics or, as another poster noted, compromised in their mental faculties. Their mindset is not worthy of study or reflection.

      What is the equivalence of condemning a manifestly evil act like suicide bombing and choosing volunteer for the weekend? As a practical matter, this simply walking and chewing gum. I can condemn (or praise) a great many things in this world and still have enough energy to write a check to the ASPCA or volunteer at my church. That argument makes no sense.

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Francios,

    You’ve completely missed the point, because you’re too focused on suicide bombers when I’m talking about the resolve of martyrs in general. And as for my position on the redirection of energy, maybe this example will be easier for you to digest:

    I have a five-year-old daughter. Passionate, artistic, opinionated, with the energy level of the sun. She, as many kids like her do, throws a fit or tantrum every once in a while. She also gets into trouble sometimes out of boredum simply because she’s gifted academically. Now, we could label her as ADD and go along with the rest of the crowd (because that’s easier right?) or, her mother and I can find a way to redirect that energy into something positive like art, music, exercise, mowing the lawn, etc.

    See the connection?

    You are getting wrapped up in this idea that I promote suicide bombers and their cause. You’re missing the point that fire is fire no matter how we use it. We can use it to burn others (like suicide bombers do) or we can use it to cook food and warm our homes (good, altruistic people). The common denominator here is passion and drive. I’m encouraging folks to use this common energy to do good. Perhaps if enough people took the magnitude of energy, focus, and passion it requires to blow one’s self to dust and use those properties (not goals or motives) against the negativity of this world, we’d see a different sort of news cast in the mornings.

    This has been a great chat, my friend. But honestly, if you haven’t gleaned my point of view (as the other readers have) by now and realize that we are on the same “side”, then you won’t. Best of luck to you.

    Peace and blessings,

    Andrew Bowen

    • Francois Lipton

      I don’t see the connection between your daughter and a suicide bomber. You, hopefully, are training her to be a studious, hard-working, decent, moral adult. That takes a lot of effort, years. How long would it take to turn her into a violent extremist? Probably no where near the investment of time and love it takes to make her into a decent young lady.

      The 9/11 hijackers for instance were raised in wealthy families and well educated (in a very messed up society). Somewhere along the line they became suicidal fanatics. They only took enough flight training to learn how to fly an airplane mid-flight into an inanimate object. That’s a lot less difficult than learning to take off and land safely. Apart from the moral bankruptcy of a suicide bombers ideology, the most that could be said of them is that they’re lazy and unserious. There is no steely resolve involved.

      You admire suicide bombers and what they stand for. You’re finding it understandably difficult to articulate your admiration without stating it explicitly. You equate their actions to all manner of noble men and women in an effort to justify their actions. Why can’t you just condemn their evil and madness?

  • erudite_recondite_eremite

    I’ll repeat myself: just who is this Ghandi guy??? [First Billy Howard, and now Andrew Bowen!] G-a-n-d-h-i !

  • http://www.bowenandrew.blogspot.com Andrew Bowen

    Ah, Spellcheck has arrived. Thank you Erudite. He certainly deserves to have his name spelled correctly.

    Peace,

    Andrew Bowen

    • http://www.billyhoward.com Billy Howard

      I had all the correct letters, just not in the correct order…Cheers, Blily

Reading: Opinion

Click here for more stories.
Point to view excerpt.
Click headline to view story.

Tartan Tambourine


  • Like the Dew?

    We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.