Follow us: Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Google+ Follow us on Linkedin Follow us on Vodpod Follow us on Tumblr Subscribe to our RSS or Atom feed
Thursday, May 17, 2012

Life's DewTubes

Click to view more DewTubes – fresh most days
Watch videos at Vodpod and more of my videos




72 Marietta — I still love you

by | 69, Add your Comment | Apr 25, 2010

Friday, April 23, 2010, was one of the saddest, most spirit-withering days of my life. I had driven to the place in downtown Atlanta where I had worked faithfully, loyally, proudly for 35 years before retiring in 2005 — The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

The old tan-colored 72 Marietta Street building, my safe haven for so many years, sat lonely, forlorn, abandoned, like a moth-balled old ship that had bore us safely through the howling storms but now had no purpose. Somehow, if I had been able, I would have wrapped my arms around the old place and said, “You did good. I loved you. This is not your fault. You did not cause this.”

Actually, I was expecting a tinge of sadness when I went there. Two weeks earlier, the AJC had vacated the 38-year-old building and moved to Dunwoody. A month before that, the paper had invited us retirees to an open house to see for one last time the place where so many of the South’s greatest journalists had practiced their craft and heeded their calling. While at the open house, I paid $20 for an old newspaper street vending rack, like those that still dot Atlanta’s street corners. I would have to come back within a month to pick it up, I was told. The old street racks were being sold as memorabilia to raise money for the Empty Stocking Fund. I bought mine on a whim. Bo Emerson, who was standing there, asked what I was going to do with it. I told him I might turn it into a liquor cabinet: It would be keeping with tradition, since a newspaper rack was where an old editor I knew hid his liquor on Saturday nights when he helped put out the Sunday paper.

So, I knew I would be a tad sad when I drove to 72 Marietta Street to pick up the rack. I was told that I had to pick it up from the loading docks. What I did not expect was the utter despair — and eeriness — that engulfed me when I turned from Fairlie Street into the loading dock area, just behind the newspaper building. It was about 4 p.m. Thirty years ago at that time of day, the docks would have been the busiest, most hopping place in Georgia. The whirring presses would have been running full-tilt, spitting out hundreds of thousands of copies of the afternoon Atlanta Journal. Conveyor belts, moving at awesome speeds, would have been clanking and grinding and workers yelling and cussing as they scurried to load a bevy of trucks with the evening paper. The fully loaded trucks, aiming to beat rush hour traffic, would race up the ramps to haul the paper all over Georgia.

How I loved it so. Those were the heady days of journalism in Atlanta.

But when I went there on April 23, there were no trucks. No people. No bustle. Dead silence. Eerie silence, the kind that gives me the willies. The docks were starkly bare, no hint that a great newspaper once was dispatched every single day from this place to households all over Georgia. I drove several times from one end to the other along the docks, looking for any stir of life. Just when I was about to give up, I saw a man in brown shorts and white T-shirt emerge from a doorway. He was rolling an empty handcart. Yes, he said, he knew about the racks, and I followed him into a cavernous warehouse. We found the one with my name on it and he helped me load it in my pickup. He said he was 42 years old and his job would end next week. He said I was lucky that I saw him, because all the other people in shipping and receiving had been let go that morning.

Back in my pickup, I sat there. The memories of how it once was flooded up again. The wry thought came to me that thirty years ago, I would not dared have parked here. If I had, someone from off the loading docks would have come charging at me, yelling at me to get the hell out of there because I blocked the trucks from getting out. You did not get in the way of those trucks. Thirty years ago at 4 p.m., though, I most likely would have been sitting in the sixth floor Atlanta Journal newsroom. While the bellowing trucks would be departing from the docks, we reporters and editors on the Journal staff would be winding down, relaxing a little for the first time after meeting tight deadlines and writing amazingly solid stories. Some of the staff would be heading home. Others of us would be heading down Fairlie Street to Emile’s for afternoon libations and perhaps a little joshing with the federal prosecutors and clerks and judges coming over from the Court House to sip their after-work cocktails. Back in the newspaper building, in the eighth floor Constitution newsroom, reporters and editors would be deciding what to run in the next morning’s paper and maybe figuring out how to follow up on the stories that the Journal beat them on. The Journal and Constitution hated each other then — a deep, healthy hatred that was a beautiful thing. (The first time in history when the Constitution out-circulated the Journal was on Aug. 17, 1977, when the morning rag reported Elvis Presley’s death. I never forgave Elvis for dying on Constitution time.)

With the old AJC street vending rack securely tied down in my pickup, and me wondering what I would tell my wife when I brought it home, I headed up the same ramp on which countless trucks bearing countless newspapers had departed daily over the decades for towns and cities all over Georgia. As I turned onto Spring Street, looming in front of me was the old Omni parking lot, now the parking place for CNN and Phillips Arena. That old parking lot also brought back a ton of memories. Many of us AJC employees parked there in the 1970s. At that time, I often worked on Saturday nights in the newsroom. During the long, late Saturday shifts, I often wandered over to the Sports Department and hung out there with the sportswriters, who were some of the best writers on the paper. Frank Hyland. Darrell Simmons. David Davidson and on and on. One of the sports editors was Lewis Grizzard, who loved to shoot the breeze. Grizzard and the others accorded me one of my greatest honors — they invited me out to the parking lot with them in the wee hours of Sunday morning, after the Sunday paper had been put to bed. In the parking lot, we pulled folding lawn chairs and beer-filled coolers out of our car trunks. We formed a circle and sat there and talked and sipped and ribbed each other until the sun came up. Grizzard usually set the tone.

Several years ago, a writer from a New York publication called me and said she was doing a story on Grizzard. She said she had heard about those early Sunday morning sessions in the parking lot and wanted to know what we talked about. “Did you discuss the day’s events?” she asked. “Did you talk about how stories were edited? Did you talk about the great players?”

I replied: “Look, ma’am. These were a bunch of sports writers. They weren’t trying to solve the world’s  great mathematical puzzles or find the meaning of life. About the only serious discussion they ever had, I remember, was whether Pabst Blue Ribbon made you fart worse than Miller High Life. It got very heated. Two guys nearly got in a fight over it.”

###
Charles Seabrook

About Charles Seabrook

A South Carolina native, Charles Seabrook has been a long-time environmental writer for The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. His books include "Cumberland Island: Strong Women, Wild Horses" and "Red Clay, Pink Cadillacs and White Gold: Georgia’s Kaolin Chalk Wars." A resident of Decatur, Georgia, Seabrook also was one of the first reporters in the world to write about the mysterious disease that would soon be known as AIDS. He has written extensively on global warming, air and water pollution, and songbird decline.

 

Print Friendly

 

  • http://www.theblacksheartimes.com Robert M Williams Jr

    Great piece, Charles. You are right. That whole situation is sad. One day … one day … people will understand, with despair, what we’re losing with the decline of great metro newspapers. By then, unfortunately, it will probably be too late. Let’s hope for enlightenment somehow, someway.

  • Monica Smith

    The papers did not decline. These purveyors of information, like so many others, were deprived of revenue in the interest of controlling the flow of information. The FOIA, together with universal suffrage and equal rights guarantees presented too great a challenge to the traditional elite and had to be brought under control. “Not enough money” turned out to be a convenient shield behind which to hide the deprivation.

    But, journalism does have to share some of the blame. Somehow, “objectivity” got perverted into reporting what happened in terms of who it happened to, when and how come, instead of who done it. In the effort to distance the subjective perspective of the reporter, the agents of events (subjects) were left out. As a result, we have a whole lot of inanimate objects determining our fate. Drivers don’t collide; “cars crash.” People don’t die; relatives “lose their loved ones.” People aren’t fired for no good reason; people “lose their jobs.” Teachers don’t spout nonsense; students “fail” and schools “don’t measure up.” Citizens don’t elect representatives; politicians “win or lose.”

    The false attribution of agency is a recognized logical fallacy. That it’s so pervasive is probably because it’s a convenient way to evade responsibility for error and bad behavior. It’s “blame the victim” on a grand scale. It also “works” the other way around when credit is erroneously assigned, as when the President is credited with passing legislation he only signed. The Congress prefers it. It allows them to say, “don’t blame us if the law is a dud.”

    Btw, it seems that maintenance and routine re-investment in facilities and plants is not calculated as economic growth and development. I’m presuming that economists doing analysis in Europe and the U.S. are using the same standards. So, that the finding, in Germany, that a reduced work week resulted in an increase in residential improvements and rehabilitation is being reported as growth in the shadow or underground economy seems significant. At least in Europe the subject is being considered. There’s only one academic economist in the U.S. who’s been looking at the U.S. underground or black market and the latest update of his data was in 2005. Economists have long left out of their calculations what they can’t easily count.

  • http://www.littlewallaby.com Frank Povah

    Australia instituted a GST partly to offset the black economy. It partly worked, though it created another one.

  • http://www.littlewallaby.com Frank Povah

    PS: One day I shall write 0f life on the composing floor and the decline of relations between comps and journos.

  • Janet Ward

    Great piece, Charlie. I haven’t looked at an AJC for months now. It’s just an awful paper, ruined by arrogant people who have no idea what journalism means.

    I, too, remember those heady days. All The President’s Men started it, I believe. Journalism became the go-to career for young, idealistic people who honestly believed they could change the world.

    Newspaper people, real newspaper people not the bean-counters who currently hold sway, are the most interesting, engaged people I know. We’ve talked about having a wake at Manuel’s. Someone should plan it.

    • http://leslieevanscreative.com Lee Leslie

      Janet:
      Your comment has stuck with me all day.
      You are right that the current paper is “awful” by the standard of the glory days, and maybe it was “ruined arrogance and people who have no idea what journalism means,” but I feel that characterization may be a wee bit unfair.
      I have no ambition or qualification to be an apologist for the AJC or Cox, but I seem to remember dozens of experiments, redesigns, research, initiatives, management and newsroom shuffles, etc. over more than a decade as local display advertising disappeared, classified moved to Craig’s List, costs went up and technology changed. This suggests to me that Cox was pretty open to trying things (turned out, many were the wrong things) and throwing money at the problems. I also seem to remember this as an industry issue.
      There’s little question that Cox was distracted by cable, broadcast and internet profit centers, acquisitions and stock price. That Cox lobbied to preserve turf and neglected staying relevant or modernizing core businesses in a timely way. That, in my opinion, was not only arrogant, but dumb.
      I suppose that instead of compromising journalism, offering early retirements (pretty honorable by today’s corporate standards), cutting back and the moving to Dunwoody, they could have just shut down the paper -- but my takeaway is that they were trying to save what was left of the AJC with the hope they could find a way to a better future. I hope they are. Since they stopped hemorrhaging money and are beginning to make some, they are also beginning to open their check book for “real newspaper” people again. Time will tell, but if we want a return to greatness, please buy a paper.
      Janet, don’t take me wrong. I mourn for what has happened to the paper and its affect on the lives of so many who I love who had their careers and lives changed so abruptly. I worry for the loss of professional journalism and the damage that will be done to our republic.
      You may be right, but I also blame four decades of failure to enforce antitrust laws and the Wall Street mentality that has infected every business in our land (subversion of truth, television in general, survivor shows and Fox News in specific, the internets, George Bush, Nancy Grace, etc). Change sucks. And it is going around.

  • Jack

    wonderfully written, charlie, although i hardly share your affection for 72 Marietta. but as for those late-Saturday night choir practices in the parking lot, well, for what it’s worth…i’m a PBR guy.

  • Tom Pain

    Newspapers failed because of monopolist business practices. The ajc had a monopoly of regional display advertising for about century. The internet blew that model up. The reason consumers don’t care that the old journalistic lions are dying, though, is because of biased reporting and editorials. The ajc realized this too late, of course. Recognizing the importance of building readership in the conservative Republican northern suburbs, they hired a too-little, too-late milquetoast conservative editorialist and sent Cynthia Tucker packing to DC. Sorry, guys, you should have made this “business decision” 10 or 20 years ago. Whether it would have helped or not, I don’t know.

    Finally, the remaining newspapers will fail because their readership has passed them by in terms of intellectual sophistication. The middle class in this country now are highly educated professionals who are being spoon fed information by poorly educated journalists. I understand that once highly paid journalists cannot find work in other professions, particularly ones that pay well. They should question the value of their education and experience and wonder whether or not their training suits the expectations of their middle-class, professional readership.

    The journalists, too, rely upon “narratives” to artificially superimpose sympathetic and villainous archetypes into their work. Journalists collect facts and hammer them into a story that suits a template, perhaps not strictly speaking political bias, but certainly one where there is a sympathetic “victim” to draw a particular reaction from a reader. Sophisticated readers see this for what it is, an attempt to distort facts and manipulate them.

    Good luck in your future endeavors.

    • http://www.littlewallaby.com Frank Povah

      “…their readership has passed them by in terms of intellectual sophistication. The middle class … are highly educated professionals who are being spoon fed information by poorly educated journalists. …once highly paid journalists cannot find work in other professions, particularly ones that pay well. They should question the value of their education and experience and wonder whether or not their training suits the expectations of their middle-class, professional readership.

      I think you’re being unfair, Tom.

      May I suggest that your “middle class”, taken as a whole and speaking generally, are neither intellectually sophisticated nor skilled in literacy – reading or writing. This is one of the major reasons that newspapers, and other publications that require actual reading, are in decline. Television and its symbiotic companion, advertising, have over the past 50 years reduced the attention span of the average adult to something less than 10 minutes, with dire consequences for the printed word.

      The average magazine reader spends a little less than 90 seconds flipping through the pages. Hence the increasing use of photographs and captions. Your “blockbuster novel” no longer has descriptive passages, chapters are just a few paragraphs long and

      * * *

      has become a literary device, replacing background and description.

      Your middle class may be highly educated, but only narrowly so – the broad general education has gone by the board and knowledge for knowledge’s sake has gone with it. This is mirrored in that employers of journalists now favor a degree over life experience – disastrous for all concerned.

      The new breed of newspaper publisher is less interested in information than it is in sensation and the same applies to all forms of news dissemination. Even the weather reports have to be sensationalized; if there’s no hurricanes then a fog with a visibility limit of 9 miles must suffice.

      If intellectual sophistication existed in the broader middle class I’d suggest that this would not be so. Newspapers would change, but they would still do what they once did – fill the gaps in the narratives and reveal the faces behind the masks. Intellectual sophistication does not call straightforward reporting of events “liberal”.

      Don’t talk to the journos about lousy reporting – not the real ones – talk to the grey-suited, grey-minded bastards who own the newspapers.

  • quincy dee

    Anyone who believes that journalists can decide for themselves what they write and how their publication should be managed has obviously never worked as one. Journalists have never -- could never -- run a publication into the ground. Sadly, the quality of journalists and journalism altogether at AJC has indeed declined over the past years. Spelling, grammar and punctuation are atrocious and staff copy editors must have been eliminated decades ago. But this situation can only be blamed on the people who hire them. Journalists have never been paid enough, but the trend today is quite clearly to hire the least qualified because one can get away with paying them less. Good journalists are turned away if unwilling to work for close to minimum wage!

  • http://www.dougmonroe.com Doug Monroe

    Beautiful heart-breaker, Charlie. When I started it, I thought you might finally be going there to clean off your old desk. I had just finished reading a NY Times Sunday Magazine piece about a Politico reporter with stuff stacked on his desk and I immediately thought of you. Hope you’re well. Some great comments here, too. I agree with Janet. A few years before “All the President’s Men,” there were only seven people majoring in news-editorial in the J-school at UGA. I also agree with Jack: PBR would never have caused the disruption of Miller.

  • Don O’Briant

    Newspaper people drank? I’m shocked! Shocked!
    That was a great piece, Charlie. It brought back a lot of memories — most of them good. It’s going to be hard to explain to my grandchildren what a great time that was and the joy of working for a newspaper. The first thing they’re going to ask is, “Grandpa, what is a newspaper?”

  • http://leslieevanscreative.com Lee Leslie

    Charlie: Loved this story and truly miss PBR in the steel cans.

  • quincy dee

    While All the President’s Men may have inspired more to study J at UGA only a couple of years before, we J-school students at GSU (at the time GSC) were already legions -- well, not quite legions, but relatively many, many more compared with UGA. We may have had an ugly urban campus but we were right in the middle of it all. The news literally unfolded in front of our eyes and we seized it with both hands and ran wiht it!

  • Joey Ledford

    Great piece, Charlie. Since I still work downtown, I often pass 72 Marietta and wonder what, if anything, will become of it. Like Jack, I don’t love the building, but I did love most of the people who worked there. For a long time, we produced a wonderful product that was engaging to read. I won’t get into what happened — others have tried to explain it — so there is really nothing left but to remember the good times and forget the bad. Don is right that it won’t be too long before young people won’t have much of an understanding of what we did there, and that might be sadder than the ghosts that now inhabit 72 Marietta.

  • Cliff Green

    Well said, my old friend.
    I join Don in being shocked about the drinking. I, for one, drank only unsweetened iced tea during many of those years. I also read the Bible during lunch hour.

    • Charles Seabrook

      Br’er Green, I think they renamed that unsweet tea George Dickel.

  • Chrys

    Those were the days my friend.

  • Elaine Manross

    Charles,

    Wonderfully written and so true! It’s sad to see the AJC among others (Rich’s, etc.) are gone from our downtown area. A lot of those buildings will live on in my memories if no where else. All the people that use to work and shop in the Marietta, Forsythe, and Luckie Street area, wonderful restaurants…….all gone.
    To Joey Ledford, our family thinks you are a wonderful man and reporter for the stories and support you gave us in the DUI death of our granddaughter Tiffani Coke in November 1999 and the subsequent trial of her Dad.
    The printed journalists must survive and newspapers must survive, no internet news for me!

    • Joey Ledford

      Thank you for your kind words! They are greatly appreciated.

      • Elaine Manross

        Are you still in journalism? Where are you working now?

  • Myra Blackmon

    Thanks, Charles for a great reflection. I’m sitting in China where my news comes from the Internet or CNN (usually in meaningless snippets), the New York Times is blocked by the government and the China Daily is left on my door handle every day.

    I grew up on the Journal, going through it many days with my grandfather who had an opinion or an idea about everything in it. That newspaper and my grandfather taught me more than I learned in years of school! I had already been missing the old AJC when they quit bringing it to Athens. The new one is pablum. My experience here makes me long for the glory days even more.

  • A.B. Albritton

    Charlie:
    Next time you go downtown, drive that pickup right up on the sidewalk on Marietta Street and stand between the Ralph and Celestine lamposts and take a bow.

  • John Futch

    Thanks for the memories, Charlie. There were probably still a few dents I left behind in the walls or some file cabinets.

    You’ll always be a special part of that time.

    John
    Long Beach, California

  • Billy Mallard

    Great story, Charlie, thanks for stirring the memories.

    We were a Consti family, so I guess I read of Elvis’s passing there. (You know that that story earned Mollie Ivins one of her few NY Times front-page bylines.)

    By the time I did my tour of duty on Marietta Street, the Journal and Consti had merged newsrooms but still pretended to be separate papers -- different morning and evening mastheads and, admittedly, separate editorial boards. But I do remember those trucks. Sure had to steer clear of them if taking a company car out on assignment.

    Mighty sad.

    Oh, and Tiger beer (Singapore) has both those American brands beat.

Reading: Life Causes

Click here for more stories.
Point to view excerpt.
Click headline to view story.

  • Like the Dew?

    We are non-commercial, all volunteer and supported by our readers. Please help sustain the Dew by making a donation.