Politics

Big tobacco claims right to kill protected by First Amendment

by Piney Woods Pete | 2, Add your Comment | Sep 8, 2009

A set of sharp suits from the money end of Tobacco Road, R.J. Reynolds and Lorillard to name two addresses, dropped by the U.S. District Court in Bowling Green, Kentucky at the end of August claiming their constitutional rights were being violtated.

200px-Smoking_warning_australiaThe U.S. Congress passed a law in June giving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate tobacco marketing. The FDA wasted no time dropping a rule book on Big Tobacco.

Basically the feds want the merchants of cancer to state clearly and boldly in every marketing and advertising piece they produce that tobacco kills. Also, the feds want to shut down anything that looks like marketing directed at kids.

R.J. Reynolds and friends contend that, posters of Joe the Camel and the Winston Bronco taped eye-level to a fourth-grader at the drug store next door to the elementary school aside, they are appalled by youth smokers and only want freedom of choice for God- fearing, patriotic American adults.

The Tobacco Roaders stand with their silk-stockinged feet on the straightforward statement of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech….” It is ironic that, at a time when every political, legal, and business brain in America is struggling with controlling medical costs, the makers of a product which add billions of dollars to the nation’s medical costs each year claim a right to continue promoting death and sickness based on the First Amendment right of free speech.

The only right Big Tobacco deserves is the right to a speedy trial.

At every turn tobacco product manufacturers have sought to glamorize their product. They have even corrupted requirements to post health warnings and encourage youth abstinence into slick appeals to light up and try one. As an example, see R.J. Reynolds response to the FDA requirement that tobacco product ingredients be available to the public ( http://www.rjrt.com/ingredients.aspx ). The web posting is sprinkled with words like “aroma” and “taste.”

Here’s my favorite line: “However, the taste characteristics of many tobacco blends that adult tobacco consumers enjoy could not be achieved without adding ingredients to the tobacco. For example, roughly 30 percent of all cigarettes sold in the United States have menthol added to their blends.”

You have to click on down to finds the dozens of other popular ingredients that adult tobacco consumers enjoy, such as isobutyraldehyde and 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol. Or that Camel laces its blend of American and Turkish tobacco with  brown sugar, coca, licorice, and high fructose corn syrup – clear evidence that they aren’t going after the kiddie market.

Here’s hoping that the judge in Bowling Green keeps in mind that the plaintiffs from Big Tobacco are merchants of death and documented liars.

printer friendly


Note: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for the agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of LikeTheDew.com. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click here to report a violation.

2 Responses to “Big tobacco claims right to kill protected by First Amendment”

  1. Keith Graham Keith Graham says:

    When I lived on Tobacco Road (in Durham, N.C.), one place used to sell cigarettes in a black pack with stark white letters that said CANCER. Of course, the same place used to hand out those leaflets that said, “The American Cancer lies.”

  2. Piney Woods Pete Piney Woods Pete says:

    Keith Graham’s memory of a Durham, NC store selling cigarettes marked “CANCER” brings to mind the South’s favorite smoker, Brother Dave Gardner. He smoked those blue Sherman cigarettes and said, “They say they’ll give you cancer. They won’t do it. They’ve got no concrete proof of that. If they did they would be concretologists.”

Leave a Comment

What is CAPTCHA and why do I have to enter it to post a comment?

Quick answer: Look at the picture (below) that contains letters. Type those letters in the CAPTCHA Code box.

Longer explanation: Our comment system now requires a CAPTCHA test (an acronym for "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart" for all comments (unless you have registered and are logged-in). CAPTCHA is an image of letters that is dynamically generated (click the speaker icon to hear it or the arrows to load another test that may be easier to read). The letters, because they're part of an image and not text (e.g. text that you could cut and paste), are difficult for a spambot or other computer program to read. Yet, a person has little trouble reading the letters in a captcha image and then typing them into the form. Using a captcha test on our website is a great way to ensure, for instance, that a person and not a spambot is filling out a web form (we used to get 100 or so spam comments every day which our volunteers had to wade through). Also, a captcha can make it difficult for a person to continuously resubmit form information and overwhelm our comment function. If you hate CAPTCHA, just register on LikeTheDew.com and login (registration is on the bottom left of our home page) and you won't be stopped by CAPTCHA.

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Piney Woods Pete
About the author Piney Woods Pete: Hard-charging salesman by day, Piney Woods Pete stays up late into the foggy night to render words.

Last 5 posts by Piney Woods Pete