Politics
What’s so great about being stupid?
Remembering George H.W. Bush’s live speech on education to students in 1991, in which he asked a question still unanswered, “What’s so great about being stupid?”, school districts in Texas, South Carolina, Florida, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois and Minnesota, are scrambling to protect our nation’s future. Fearing the children will learn Obama is: president, black, smart, reasonable and does not currently have horns or a tail; many districts have decided not to air the program. Others will require that parents sign permission slips before allowing the children to view the controversial program about the need to work hard and stay in school.
Following in the footsteps of Reagan and Bush One, Obama plans to speak directly to students. His address will be shown live on C-SPAN at noon EDT Tuesday and could have been seen by students unedited, uncensored and without benefit of Fox news providing speculation of what the President really was saying. Having grown tired of attending town hall meetings, totally bat-shit crazy parents all over the country are now demanding their school officials protect their innocent children from hearing such outlandish and unproven ideas involving hard work, goal setting and taking their school year seriously.
In Florida, GOP chairman Jim Greer released a statement that he was “absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama’s socialist ideology.”
“As far as I am concerned, this is not civics education–it gives the appearance of creating a cult of personality,” said Oklahoma state Sen. Steve Russell. “This is something you’d expect to see in North Korea or in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.”
Arizona state schools superintendent Tom Horne, a Republican, said lesson plans for teachers created by Obama’s Education Department “call for a worshipful rather than critical approach.”
Seminole County parent Steffani Martino, whose daughter is a student at Lyman High in Longwood, FL, said she might have her teenager skip school Tuesday. “I don’t side with anything Obama agrees with,” Martino said.
One program note: The White House plans to release the speech several hours beforehand, online, so parents can read it.
Photo Credit: Carrie Devorah / WENN.com
-
I’m feeling wistful for the McCarthy era.
-
Why release the speech beforehand and online? The kind of parent who wants to keep his or her children from hearing the president’s speech does not know how to get online, and if they should luck up and hit the right buttons, they wouldn’t be able to read it.
-
How can our children have any respect for our president if their parents are afraid to let them hear him speak?
-
Keeping the kids at home will prevent them from what? Seeing the President’s address on streaming internet feeds? hearing and seeing him on the evening news shows?
Recto-cranialis is a terrible disease, really. Also known among the secessionists in Texas, as a “bad case of dumbass.” (Can we say that in print?) -
Leslie and commenters should move to Korea or Venezuala so that when their leaders speak at learning institutions the option of not watching is not there.
-
I’m way too heavy to weigh in on this one. But i would like to hear Brenden’s slice on this subject. Brenden buddy, are ya out there? Quit ironing your brown shirt and give us a comment, pal.
-
Anybody with a functioning brain, and I proudly count myself among that group, should be damned nervous that so many people seem to be so clueless these days. Talk radio, Fox and others of their ilk are doing a fantastic job of stirring up the stupid who pay no attention to what’s actually going on. As somebody smart once said, people are entitled to their opinions but they aren’t entitled to make up facts. Sadly and frighteningly, that’s exactly what the radical right is doing. My moderate Republican friends (and I have plenty, including close relatives) are just as concerned as I am. If so many people prefer bloviating to truth, what’s to become of us?
-
Jingle; This is exactly what I’ve written to a group of friends. This is beginning to get scary. How many are believing this junk? I can picture Rove sitting back and chuckling at his machinations.
-
isn’t it grand irony that parents who are not allowing their kids to hear this speech will hear it anyway on the net…oh what delicious sweetness! Our President Obama got it over again all those racists non thinkers.
as for the country of jim crow…perhaps succession is still an option?
-
If a Republican president had chosen to give a speech on this topic to the nation’s schoolchildren, and some parents and schools had opted not to show it to children, the right would soundly denounce them all as being unpatriotic. I fail to see how Obama can say much of anything that will poison children’s minds any more than, say, watching “Real Housewives” or playing Nintendo.
I’m also appalled at this recent act of histrionics by the right. Yesterday, at the Decatur Book Festival, I was working as a volunteer and mentioned to two other volunteers that a local NPR radio personality was there. One volunteer was impressed, the other said he’d never heard of her. I said, “I guess you don’t listen to NPR.” His immediate, indignant response, “I would NEVER listen to NPR.” His favored radio personality is Rush, and he proudly told me that he “thinks for himself.” But he doesn’t read the AJC.
So many right-wingers have told me they think for themselves, I think it must be something that the radio hosts tell them. But how can they claim to be thinking for themselves if they don’t even listen to or read opposition information? Whenever they point out all the stuff that mainstream media hasn’t reported, I usually tell them that I read newspapers and listen to NPR and I’ve heard all of that on the radio. Facts don’t seem to matter. I’m really TRYING to be open minded, but this is the kind of stuff that really disgusts me.
I mean, why was this dude volunteering at a book festival if he doesn’t read?
-
And we dared to hope that there had been a positive and defining shift in this country when Obama was elected! Apparently, it was a precursor to the uncovering of a deep ugliness that still exists and seems to be proliferating. I thought we had hit the bottom with Palin’s death panel BS—but this latest is not to be believed.
As an earlier commentor said, this is beginning to make the McCarthy era look like the good old days. -
In my mind it has now been confirmed – stupidity and paranoia are running rampant in this country. I can not believe there is anything to debate about this – our president, elected by a majority of our citizens, wants to encourage school children to do well in school. By the wildest stretch of my imagination I can not come up with anything controversial about this. I am a teacher, and my students will be watching this speech on Tuesday!
-
Rush and his ilk have started calling the Associated Press, among other outlets, “state-run media.” Well, I’ll be damned if I can find it. Over the weekend, one of the network news broadcasts put on a woman who said something to the effect that “Obama is in favor of abortion and gay marriage” and she didn’t want her child hearing that in the president’s stay-in-school-and-work-hard speech.
This was not FOX News. But is it fair and balance to give this idiot woman equal air time in opposition to our duly elected president and his speech to school children? Not only is the national media not “state-run” it has completely caved in to the loony right. -
Wow, I’ve actually been requested to participate in this important debate. I was going to keep my browser today shut but since Austin wants to know what I think, here goes:
Nothing “wrong” per se with this, I suppose, but it strikes me as the last act of a desperate man. It’s staged political hackery designed to manufacture sense of false imperium, recalling those Roman columns in Denver (WTF?). Barry is obviously hurting in public opinion because he’s occupied all positions and none on the public option. “So let’s give a milquetoast speech to the children encouraging them to work hard ‘n’ stuff. Makes me sound smart and compassionate because I can yammer on with the best of ‘em.” Meh. But should people keep their kids away? Double meh.
But I guess more important to point out the anti-capitalist, race-mongering drivel that sustains your arguments here. Never forget many of you are far more invested in “racists non thinkers” [sic], “McCarthy era,” “faith-based, wealth-based or class-based” than folks like me who can articulate a rational, empirically-sound social policy (albeit the theory requires some nummeracy and intellectual sophistication) independent of conjuring shadowy false boogey-men. Instead of refuting my arguements rationally, your agenda relies upon calling me a “brownshirt” so you can urge the mob to pursue extra-judicial intellectual prosecutions to throw stones my way because I 1) refute your arguments by questioning your premises and conclusions 2) offer tractable counter-arguments and 3) shine a bright light upon the ignorance that represents the longest pole of your ideology.
Austin: You’re welcome!
-
Obama must get a meaningful public option bill from this Congress given the failure of his cap and trade, a major “green” initiative of his. If Obama fails on the public option, the opposition will only grow louder and his own governing coalition will splinter; evidence indicates they may be already. The upcoming fall session will be very consequential for the next 3.5 years. Barry knows it.
And sorry, Lee, to your point of sarcasm: you and many posters here constantly insist upon racist origins whenever commenting on Barry’s opposition. Your commrades here constantly mention an irrational fear that could lead to some vague threat against the president. That Rush, Fox, Hannity, etc., stoke white outrage that with the goal of actual, physical harm befalling the president. These are invidious lies designed to deny the opposition their voice in the debate. Very illiberal.
We oppose Obama and Pelosi, et. al., because their misguided policies will destroy productive sectors of the economy. We resist them with political and economic logic, highlighting a long legacy of failure and insolvency for innumerable worthless gov’t programs. Gov’t unjustly consumes 50% of GDP. That more gov’t means less liberty. Since you cannot defend Barry’s policies on the merits, it’s much easier to call us racists and try to discredit the opposition’s logic as Trojan horse for a new age of Jim Crow. In other words, “Shut up,” you said. That’s fine. I just don’t want you to think you’re getting away with something clever by doing so because it’s really obvious and stupid.
-
(sigh)
-
Looking forward to reading the awesome, insightful commentary on Barry’s sermon on the hill. Suddenly, I feel an inch taller! C’mon, Dewers, faster!
-
Brenden don’t include all Dewers in the Liberal boat. Begins to sound like you joined their grouping ideas. And Leslie how do you know anything about OBs lifelong ideas? He can’t even produce a birth certificate. Maybe you know where he was accually born.
-
C Smith — you want answers spanning from Obama’s lifelong ideas to where he was born? How shall we parry if you’re traipsing all over the floor? The lifelong ideas? Why are you asking Lee? You should ask Obama. And the “birther” thing? Discussed, resolved, Hawaii, over.
Now, as to the point of this whole thread (and Brenden, you’re not shy, so please join in): Do you have thoughts about parents who would discourage their children from the message that they should share responsibility for their own education?
I will look forward to your thoughtful replies, to my own learning moments. I won’t join in again, myself. I’ll leave that to others, if they choose. — Regards
-
Brenden as you can see it does not take long eloquint remarks to set these people into a ridiculous rant. THE DEW has moved so far to the left that without comments from the likes of you to keep it interesting it would go the way of AJC before it really gets started. My interest in The Dew is anyone can make an instant comment unlike most other news media that report without imediate consequences. Lee Leslie has provided the explanation of his use of “lifelong” which has its merits. With independent views I am willing to give anyone a chance at leadership as long as my right to vote stays intach.
-
Lee: you tow Obama’s line. We have solutions, you just don’t like them. So you say they don’t exist. Or are racist.
Meg: It’s none of my business if a parent wants to keep a child home because of a political speech. Though I don’t suppose I’d keep my own children at home for this as one goes to school mostly for the purposes of being well socialized for a lifetime of adults irrelevantly droning on and on. I somehow made it through a school system rife with leftist political propaganda (not saying Obama’s, er, inspiring speech was such) and look how I turned out.
C Smith: you seem to have independently detected a hard-line, hard-left pointlessly partisan progressive collectivist bent to the posting, commentary, news articles, required reading, historical perspective, etc. Whew, I thought it was just me — good to know I’m not crazy. -
Dear Mr. C. Smith.
If you want to convince people and appear to be intelligent, I suggest you learn how to spell. It is eloquent and intact —-not eloquint and intach. As far as the rest of what you wrote, it is written so poorly that I have no idea what you were trying to say. Perhaps if there had been a presidential speech when you were in school you would have paid more attention in class. -
Matthew, I’m not talking about Republican problems for Obama. He’s facing resistance from within his own party. Resistance by people who have sense, like many American people, that this public option is worse than a nuclear bomb on the nation’s economy. You’re correct, the Republicans lost and must pay the price for trying to placate the bedwetting leftist Democrat collectivist leadership, rather than fighting them and highlighting their corrupt, destructive ignorance. Anyone of the conservative faithful could have told Dubya that was a bad idea — he was way too much like you guys here! He let me down far more than any of you.
And does only the partisan label matter to you? So if the GOP comes up with a plan to lower cost, increase coverage, support doctors — you will dismiss it out of hand? Nice.
-
Well Ms. Annis I suppose my spelling may not be up to your standards but our country has more problems than spelling. When you reach my age any party that is in control has burnt you in some way or the other. Oh yeah, I’m not trying to convince any one of my intelligence. SHOWS DOESN’T IT.
-
Oh yeah! When I was in school the President got his head blown to bits by a radical from a book suppository building. I wish he had been in there to learn how to spell!
-
I would support Obama or any other politican who supported the specific reforms I mentioned:
1) establishing a national market for health insurance so I can buy a policy in another state
2) sensible caps on non-economic medical liability
3) NOT expanding insolvent entitlement programs
However, the democrat plan does nothing on No. 1 and pays lip service to No. 2 and drastically violates No. 3. If a republican came up with the same thing, I would also reject it.
Leave a Reply
Related Posts
- From NASCAR to Notre Dame
- Don’t fly me to the moon
- The vision thing
- Speaking of Giant Sucking Sounds
- Michael Steele Is Harvey Dent Minus The Lucky Coin… And The Skin Grafts
- From the Government That Gave Us Tang
- Who’s prevaricating now?
- Guns & popcorn butter
- Yo’ Jimmy, The Crease is Clean
- Rude, crude and socially unacceptable may be what we need
Last 5 posts by Lee Leslie
- Health Care: When You'll Get Yours - March 17th, 2010
- Wisdom from the dirt - March 14th, 2010
- Reason for optimism - March 10th, 2010
- Did you see The Warning? - February 18th, 2010
- Get Me Off The Road, Please - February 16th, 2010




















37 Responses to “What’s so great about being stupid?”